Sellers C
Department of History, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1997 Nov;87(11):1824-35. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.11.1824.
Today, our understanding of and approach to the exogenous causes of cancer are dominated by epidemiological practices that came into widespread use after World War II. This paper examines the forces, considerations, and controversies that shaped postwar risk factor epidemiology in the United States. It is argued that, for all of the new capabilities it brought, this risk factor epidemiology has left us with less of a clinical eye for unrecognized cancer hazards, especially from limited and localized exposures in the work-place. The focus here is on Wilhelm Hueper, author of the first textbook on occupational cancer (1942). Hueper became the foremost spokesman for earlier identification practices centering on occupational exposures. The new epidemiological methods and associated institutions that arose in the 1940s and 1950s bore an unsettled relation to earlier claims and methods that some, Hueper among them, interpreted as a challenge. Hueper's critique of the new epidemiology identified some of its limitations and potentially debilitating consequences that remain with us today.
如今,我们对癌症外部病因的理解和研究方法主要受二战后广泛应用的流行病学实践主导。本文探讨了塑造美国战后风险因素流行病学的各种力量、考量因素及争议。有人认为,尽管风险因素流行病学带来了诸多新能力,但它使我们对未被认识到的癌症危害缺乏临床洞察力,尤其是对工作场所有限和局部接触所导致的危害。这里重点关注威廉·休珀,他是第一本职业癌症教科书(1942年)的作者。休珀成为了以职业接触为核心的早期识别方法的首要代言人。20世纪40年代和50年代出现的新流行病学方法及相关机构与早期的主张和方法关系并不确定,其中一些人,包括休珀,将其视为一种挑战。休珀对新流行病学的批评指出了其一些局限性以及可能带来的不利后果,这些至今仍影响着我们。