Darling W G, Hondzinski J M
Department of Exercise Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Oct;116(3):485-92. doi: 10.1007/pl00005776.
The purpose of these experiments was to investigate whether visual perceptions of the earth-fixed vertical axis are more accurate than those of intrinsic body-fixed axes. In one experiment, nine neurologically normal young adult subjects' abilities to position a luminescent rod vertically or parallel to the longitudinal axis of the head or trunk were studied in four conditions: (1) earth-fixed--subjects stood erect with the head aligned to the trunk and visually aligned a hand-held rod to vertical; (2) earth--subjects aligned the rod to vertical as in 1, but the orientations of the head and trunk were varied in the sagittal and frontal planes on each trial; (3) head--frontal and/or sagittal plane orientation of the subject's head was varied on each trial and the rod was aligned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the head; (4) trunk--frontal and/or sagittal plane orientation of the subject's trunk was varied on each trial and the rod was aligned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the trunk. Note that in conditions 2, 3, and 4 the head and trunk were never aligned with each other. Also, each condition was carried out in normal light and in complete darkness. Perceptual errors were measured in both the frontal and the sagittal planes. The results showed that the variable errors were significantly lower when subjects aligned the rod to vertical rather than to the longitudinal axis of the head or trunk. Also, errors were similar in size in the two planes and were unaffected by vision of the surrounding environment. In a second experiment, subjects were seated and controlled the position of a luminescent rod held by a robot. They aligned the rod either to the longitudinal axis of their head or to the vertical in complete darkness, under three conditions similar to those described above: (1) earth-fixed, (2) earth, and (3) head. There was no possibility of use of kinesthetic information for controlling rod position in this experiment as in the first experiment. The results were similar to those of the first experiment, as subjects aligned the rod more accurately to vertical than to the longitudinal axis of the head. These results show convincingly that visual perceptions of earth-fixed vertical are more accurate than perceptions of intrinsic axes fixed to the head or trunk.
这些实验的目的是研究对地球固定垂直轴的视觉感知是否比对身体固有轴的视觉感知更准确。在一项实验中,研究了9名神经功能正常的年轻成年受试者在四种条件下将发光棒垂直放置或与头部或躯干的纵轴平行放置的能力:(1)地球固定——受试者直立,头部与躯干对齐,通过视觉将手持棒调整到垂直方向;(2)地球——受试者像在条件1中那样将棒调整到垂直方向,但在每次试验中头部和躯干在矢状面和额状面的方向会发生变化;(3)头部——在每次试验中受试者头部的额状面和/或矢状面方向发生变化,棒与头部的纵轴平行;(4)躯干——在每次试验中受试者躯干的额状面和/或矢状面方向发生变化,棒与躯干的纵轴平行。请注意,在条件2、3和4中,头部和躯干从未相互对齐。此外,每种条件都在正常光照和完全黑暗的环境中进行。在额状面和矢状面都测量了感知误差。结果表明,当受试者将棒调整到垂直方向而不是与头部或躯干的纵轴平行时,可变误差显著更低。此外,两个平面中的误差大小相似,并且不受周围环境视觉的影响。在第二项实验中,受试者就座并控制由机器人握持的发光棒的位置。在与上述三种类似的条件下,他们在完全黑暗中将棒与头部的纵轴或垂直方向对齐:(1)地球固定,(2)地球,(3)头部。与第一项实验不同,在本实验中不可能利用动觉信息来控制棒的位置。结果与第一项实验相似,因为受试者将棒与垂直方向对齐比与头部的纵轴对齐更准确。这些结果令人信服地表明,对地球固定垂直轴的视觉感知比对固定在头部或躯干上的固有轴的感知更准确。