Suppr超能文献

股腘动脉搭桥术与股胫动脉搭桥术用于下肢血管重建

Femoropopliteal versus femorotibial bypass grafting for lower extremity revascularization.

作者信息

Hallin R W

出版信息

Am Surg. 1976 Jul;42(7):522-6.

PMID:937862
Abstract

Thirty-nine femoropopliteal revascularization procedures were compared with 35 femorotibial revascularization and one brachioradial revascularization over a follow-up period of six months to six years. Preoperative study, operative technique, results and complications are described. Living patency is compared with closure rates. The living patency rates are 49 per cent and 51 per bent for the femoropopliteal and femorotibial group. The complication rate was higher in the femorotibial group by four times (37% compared to 10%). Four reoperations were done because of progression of the patient's disease in the femorotibial group. Femorotibial revascularization is at least as effective as femoropopliteal revascularization, and produces a comparable live patency record, but with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

摘要

在6个月至6年的随访期内,对39例股腘动脉血管重建手术与35例股胫动脉血管重建手术及1例肱桡动脉血管重建手术进行了比较。描述了术前研究、手术技术、结果及并发症。将存活通畅率与闭塞率进行了比较。股腘动脉组和股胫动脉组的存活通畅率分别为49%和51%。股胫动脉组的并发症发生率高出四倍(分别为37%和10%)。股胫动脉组有4例因患者病情进展而进行了再次手术。股胫动脉血管重建至少与股腘动脉血管重建一样有效,并且产生了相当的存活通畅记录,但术后并发症发生率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验