Geraedts M, Lüdtke R
Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119(9):417-22.
Profiling of performance and quality in gynecological surgery is discussed. Unfortunately, most report cards miss valid clinical benchmarks. Within the German study on quality assurance in gynecological surgery we explored whether indicators of quality were suitable as clinical benchmarks. Using a factor analytic approach, we reduced the number of indicators and obtained in a set of 13 indicators of clinical quality. On the basis of the study data on post operative infections we show that these indicators are suitable as clinical benchmarks: the clinical benchmarks are able to make health care quality transparent and demonstrate opportunities for improvement of the processes of gynecological care.
本文讨论了妇科手术的性能和质量分析。遗憾的是,大多数报告卡都缺少有效的临床基准。在德国妇科手术质量保证研究中,我们探讨了质量指标是否适合作为临床基准。通过因子分析方法,我们减少了指标数量,并获得了一组13个临床质量指标。基于术后感染的研究数据,我们表明这些指标适合作为临床基准:临床基准能够使医疗质量透明化,并展示改善妇科护理流程的机会。