Suppr超能文献

[妇科手术基准:德国妇产科学会质量保证研究结果]

[Benchmarks for surgical gynecology: results of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics Quality Assurance Study].

作者信息

Geraedts M, Lüdtke R

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119(9):417-22.

PMID:9381836
Abstract

Profiling of performance and quality in gynecological surgery is discussed. Unfortunately, most report cards miss valid clinical benchmarks. Within the German study on quality assurance in gynecological surgery we explored whether indicators of quality were suitable as clinical benchmarks. Using a factor analytic approach, we reduced the number of indicators and obtained in a set of 13 indicators of clinical quality. On the basis of the study data on post operative infections we show that these indicators are suitable as clinical benchmarks: the clinical benchmarks are able to make health care quality transparent and demonstrate opportunities for improvement of the processes of gynecological care.

摘要

本文讨论了妇科手术的性能和质量分析。遗憾的是,大多数报告卡都缺少有效的临床基准。在德国妇科手术质量保证研究中,我们探讨了质量指标是否适合作为临床基准。通过因子分析方法,我们减少了指标数量,并获得了一组13个临床质量指标。基于术后感染的研究数据,我们表明这些指标适合作为临床基准:临床基准能够使医疗质量透明化,并展示改善妇科护理流程的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验