Rice T, Després J P, Pérusse L, Gagnon J, Leon A S, Skinner J S, Wilmore J H, Rao D C, Bouchard C
Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Obes Res. 1997 Sep;5(5):417-24. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00664.x.
A major gene hypothesis for abdominal visceral fat (AVF) level, both before and after adjustment for total body fat mass, was investigated in 86 white families who participated in the HERITAGE Family Study. In this study, sedentary families were tested for a battery of measures (baseline), endurance exercise trained for 20 weeks, and then remeasured again. The baseline measures reported here are unique in that the variance due to a potentially important environmental factor (activity level) was limited. AVF area was assessed at L4 to L5 by the use of computerized tomography scan, and total body fat mass was assessed with underwater weighing. For fat mass, a putative locus accounted for 64% of the variance, but there was no evidence of a multifactorial component (i.e., no polygenic and/or common familial environmental effects). For AVF area, both a major gene effect accounting for 54% of the variance and a multifactorial component accounting for 17% of the variance were significant. However, after AVF area was adjusted for the effects of total level of body fat, the support for a major gene was reduced. In particular, there was a major effect for fat mass-adjusted AVF area, but it was not transmitted from parents to offspring (i.e., the three transmission probabilities were equal). The importance of this study is twofold. First, these results confirm a previous study that suggested that there is a putative major locus for AVF and for total body fat mass. Second, the findings from the HERITAGE Family Study suggest that the factors underlying AVF area in sedentary families may be similar to those in the population at large, which includes both sedentary and active families. Whether the gene(s) responsible for the high levels of AVF area is the same as that which influences total body fat content remains to be further investigated.
在参与遗产家庭研究的86个白人家庭中,研究了一个关于腹部内脏脂肪(AVF)水平的主要基因假说,该假说在调整全身脂肪量前后均进行了研究。在这项研究中,久坐不动的家庭接受了一系列测量(基线测量),进行了20周的耐力运动训练,然后再次进行测量。此处报告的基线测量结果具有独特性,因为潜在重要环境因素(活动水平)导致的方差有限。通过计算机断层扫描在L4至L5水平评估AVF面积,并用水下称重法评估全身脂肪量。对于脂肪量,一个假定的基因座占方差的64%,但没有多因素成分的证据(即没有多基因和/或共同家族环境效应)。对于AVF面积,占方差54%的主要基因效应和占方差17%的多因素成分均具有显著性。然而,在调整AVF面积以消除全身脂肪总量的影响后,对主要基因的支持度降低。特别是,脂肪量调整后的AVF面积有一个主要效应,但它并未从父母传递给后代(即三个传递概率相等)。这项研究的重要性体现在两个方面。首先,这些结果证实了先前的一项研究,该研究表明存在一个关于AVF和全身脂肪量的假定主要基因座。其次,遗产家庭研究的结果表明,久坐不动家庭中AVF面积的潜在因素可能与包括久坐和活跃家庭在内的总体人群中的因素相似。导致AVF面积高水平的基因是否与影响全身脂肪含量的基因相同,仍有待进一步研究。