Halm E A, Causino N, Blumenthal D
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
JAMA. 1997 Nov 26;278(20):1677-81.
Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician "gatekeeper" to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven.
To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost.
Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians
Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass.
All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61%) responded.
Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care.
Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physician-patient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32% of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40% the same, 21% gatekeeping as worse, and 7% were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans.
Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gate-keeping. Overall, 72% of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.
几乎所有管理式医疗计划都依赖医生“把关人”来控制专科、医院及其他昂贵服务的使用。把关旨在通过加强协调与预防并减少重复或不适当的医疗服务来降低成本,同时维持或提高医疗质量。把关是否能实现这些目标在很大程度上仍未得到证实。
评估与传统医疗相比,医生对把关在行政工作、患者医疗质量、资源使用合理性及成本方面影响的态度。
对初级保健医生的横断面调查
马萨诸塞州波士顿市的门诊设施
所有同时担任马萨诸塞州综合医院员工的初级保健把关人和传统蓝十字/蓝盾医疗服务提供者的医生。在接受调查的330名医生中,202名(61%)做出了回应。
医生对把关在21个医疗方面影响的评分,包括行政工作、医患互动、决策、资源使用合理性、成本及医疗质量。
医生报告称,与传统医疗相比,把关在控制成本、预防服务的频率和合理性以及对患者整体医疗情况的了解方面有积极影响(P<0.001)。他们还认为把关增加了文书工作和电话沟通,对整体医疗质量、专科医生就诊机会、开具昂贵检查和治疗的能力、临床决策的自由度、与患者相处的时间、医患关系以及住院和实验室检查的合理使用产生了负面影响(P<0.001)。总体而言,32%的医生认为把关优于传统医疗,40%认为两者相同,21%认为把关不如传统医疗,7%持混合意见。对把关的积极评价与临床实践年限较少、全科医生培训以及把关和健康维护组织计划的经验有关。
医生指出了把关的积极和消极影响。总体而言,72%的医生认为把关优于或等同于传统医疗安排。