Sütsch G, Kim J H, Bracht C, Kiowski W
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Nov;62(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90049-7.
Therapy with nitroglycerin is widely used in the treatment of angina pectoris, but development of tolerance is a major problem. Nitrovasodilators other than nitroglycerin may be less prone to induce vascular tolerance. This investigation was designed to test whether the alternative nitric oxide donor linsidomine maintains its vasodilator effects in the presence of nitroglycerin tolerance.
We tested the vascular effects of nitroglycerin and linsidomine (SIN-1) in forearm resistance arteries (venous occlusion plethysmography) and hand veins (venous compliance technique) using a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled regimen in 33 healthy subjects (age range, 22 to 38 years; mean age, 26 years) before and after 7 days of assignment to either 1 week of nitroglycerin administration (0.83 mg/hr) for induction of tolerance or placebo administration.
Vascular responses of both vascular beds to nitroglycerin (in veins: mean difference, 42.3%; confidence interval [CI], 3% to 81.7%; p < 0.05; in arteries: mean difference, 65.0%; CI, 38.9% to 91.1%; p < 0.01) but not to linsidomine (in veins: mean difference, -13.8%; CI, -53.5 to 25.8%; not significant; in arteries: -19.7%; CI, -33.7% to -5.6%; not significant) were attenuated in the nitroglycerin patch group, whereas the placebo group showed no differences to either nitroglycerin (in arteries: mean difference, -7.5%; CI, -44.6% to 29.6%; in veins: -10.6%; CI, -58.2% to 36.9%) or linsidomine (in arteries: 4.5%; CI, -12.8% to 21.7%; in veins: -13.1%; CI, -4.5% to 29.8%).
These results suggest that short-term administration of sydnonimines can overcome the loss of vascular relaxation associated with long-term nitroglycerin therapy.
硝酸甘油疗法广泛应用于心绞痛治疗,但耐受性的产生是一个主要问题。除硝酸甘油外的其他硝基血管扩张剂可能较不易诱发血管耐受性。本研究旨在测试替代性一氧化氮供体吗多明在存在硝酸甘油耐受性的情况下是否能维持其血管扩张作用。
我们采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照方案,在33名健康受试者(年龄范围22至38岁,平均年龄26岁)中,于分配至接受1周硝酸甘油给药(0.83毫克/小时)以诱导耐受性或安慰剂给药前后,测试硝酸甘油和吗多明(SIN-1)在前臂阻力动脉(静脉阻塞体积描记法)和手部静脉(静脉顺应性技术)中的血管效应。
硝酸甘油贴片组中,两个血管床对硝酸甘油的血管反应(静脉:平均差异42.3%;置信区间[CI],3%至81.7%;p<0.05;动脉:平均差异65.0%;CI,38.9%至91.1%;p<0.01)减弱,但对吗多明的反应(静脉:平均差异-13.8%;CI,-53.5%至25.8%;无显著性差异;动脉:-19.7%;CI,-33.7%至-5.6%;无显著性差异)未减弱,而安慰剂组对硝酸甘油(动脉:平均差异-7.5%;CI,-44.6%至29.6%;静脉:-10.6%;CI,-58.2%至36.9%)或吗多明(动脉:4.5%;CI,-12.8%至21.7%;静脉:-13.1%;CI,-4.5%至29.8%)均无差异。
这些结果表明,短期给予西地那非可克服长期硝酸甘油治疗相关的血管舒张功能丧失。