Behr T M, Wulst E, Radetzky S, Blumenthal R D, Dunn R M, Gratz S, Rave-Fränk M, Schmidberger H, Raue F, Becker W
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Cancer Res. 1997 Dec 1;57(23):5309-19.
Whereas in advanced metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens have achieved only limited success clinically, more recently, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 131I-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has shown promising results. The aims of this study were to compare, in an animal model, the therapeutic efficacy of RIT to clinically used "standard" chemotherapeutic regimens and to evaluate whether combination strategies of both modalities may be feasible and may help to improve therapeutic results in this rather radioresistant tumor type. Nude mice, bearing s.c. xenografts of the human MTC cell line, TT, were treated either with the 131I-labeled anti-CEA MAb, F023C5 IgG, or were administered chemotherapeutic regimens that had shown promising results in patients with metastatic MTC (doxorubicin and cisplatinum monotherapy, combinations of both agents, and a 5-fluorouracil/dacarbazine/streptozotocin scheme). Control groups were left untreated or were injected with an irrelevant radiolabeled antibody at equitoxic dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent was determined. Combinations of chemotherapy and RIT were evaluated as well. Toxicity and tumor growth were monitored at weekly intervals. From the chemotherapeutic agents and schemes tested, doxorubicin monotherapy was the most effective; combination therapies did not result in an increased antitumor efficacy, but they did result in more severe toxicity. At equitoxic doses, no significant difference was found between the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin and that of RIT. Myelotoxicity was dose limiting with radiolabeled MAbs (MTD, 600 microCi), as well as with chemotherapeutic regimens containing alkylating agents (cisplatinum, dacarbazine, or streptozotocin). At its MTD (200 microg), doxorubicin caused only mild myelotoxicity, and despite signs of cardiac toxicity, gastrointestinal side effects were dose limiting. Accordingly, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) enabled dose intensification with RIT (MTD with BMT, 1100 microCi), which led to further increased antitumor efficacy, whereas BMT was unable to increase the MTD of doxorubicin. Due to the complementarity of toxic side effects but an anticipated synergism of antitumor efficacy, combinations of RIT with doxorubicin were tested. Administrations of 500 microCi of 131I-labeled anti-CEA and, 48 h later, 200 microg of doxorubicin (i.e., 83 and 100% of the respective single-agent MTDs), were the highest doses that did not result in an increased lethality; with bone marrow support, 1000 microCi of 131I-labeled anti-CEA could be combined with 200 microg of doxorubicin (i.e., 90 and 100% of the individual MTDs). Therapeutic results of this combined radioimmunochemotherapy were superior to equitoxic monotherapy with either agent, and indication for synergistic antitumor effects is given. At its respective MTD, radioimmunochemotherapy led to a 36% cure rate if it was given without bone marrow support and to a 85% permanent cure rate if it was given with bone marrow support. The animal model, as presented in this study, seems to be useful for the preclinical testing of therapeutic agents for the systemic treatment of MTC. At equitoxic doses, RIT with radiolabeled anti-CEA antibodies seems to be equally as effective as chemotherapy with doxorubicin. Combination of RIT and doxorubicin chemotherapy seems to have synergistic therapeutic efficacy, which may be due to a radiosensitizing effect of doxorubicin.
在晚期转移性甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)中,各种化疗方案在临床上仅取得了有限的成功,最近,用131I标记的抗癌胚抗原(CEA)单克隆抗体(MAb)进行的放射免疫疗法(RIT)已显示出有前景的结果。本研究的目的是在动物模型中比较RIT与临床使用的“标准”化疗方案的治疗效果,并评估两种治疗方式的联合策略是否可行,以及是否有助于改善这种相对放射抵抗性肿瘤类型的治疗结果。将携带人MTC细胞系TT皮下异种移植物的裸鼠,用131I标记的抗CEA MAb F023C5 IgG治疗,或给予在转移性MTC患者中已显示出有前景结果的化疗方案(阿霉素和顺铂单药治疗、两种药物的联合使用,以及5-氟尿嘧啶/达卡巴嗪/链脲佐菌素方案)。对照组不进行治疗或注射等毒性剂量水平的无关放射性标记抗体。确定每种药物的最大耐受剂量(MTD)。还评估了化疗与RIT的联合使用。每周监测毒性和肿瘤生长情况。在所测试的化疗药物和方案中,阿霉素单药治疗最有效;联合治疗并未导致抗肿瘤疗效增加,但确实导致了更严重的毒性。在等毒性剂量下,阿霉素和RIT的治疗效果之间未发现显著差异。骨髓毒性是放射性标记MAb(MTD,600微居里)以及含烷化剂(顺铂、达卡巴嗪或链脲佐菌素)的化疗方案的剂量限制因素。在其MTD(200微克)时,阿霉素仅引起轻度骨髓毒性,尽管有心脏毒性迹象,但胃肠道副作用是剂量限制因素。因此,骨髓移植(BMT)可使RIT的剂量增加(BMT时的MTD,1100微居里),这导致抗肿瘤疗效进一步提高,而BMT无法增加阿霉素的MTD。由于毒性副作用的互补性,但预期抗肿瘤疗效有协同作用,因此测试了RIT与阿霉素的联合使用。给予500微居里的131I标记抗CEA,48小时后给予200微克阿霉素(即分别为各自单药MTD的83%和100%),是不会导致致死率增加的最高剂量;在骨髓支持下,1000微居里的131I标记抗CEA可与200微克阿霉素联合使用(即分别为各自MTD的90%和100%)。这种联合放射免疫化疗的治疗结果优于两种药物的等毒性单药治疗,并显示出协同抗肿瘤作用的迹象。在各自的MTD下,联合放射免疫化疗在无骨髓支持时导致36%的治愈率,在有骨髓支持时导致85%的永久治愈率。本研究中所呈现的动物模型似乎可用于MTC全身治疗药物的临床前测试。在等毒性剂量下,用放射性标记抗CEA抗体的RIT似乎与阿霉素化疗同样有效。RIT与阿霉素化疗的联合使用似乎具有协同治疗效果,这可能是由于阿霉素的放射增敏作用。