Steffens D C, Krishnan K R, Helms M J
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 1997;6(1):10-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)6:1<10::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-9.
In this analysis we examined studies of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to compare efficacy and drop-out rates. Frequency of reported side effects was also studied. Using Medline, we located 36 clinical trials of TCAs and SSRIs in a double-blind comparison. We performed a meta-analysis on these studies and on a subgroup of 21 studies that had more uniformly defined outcome criteria. The main outcome measures were efficacy for treatment completers and for the intention-to-treat group; drop-out rates due to adverse reactions and lack of efficacy; and reported side effects. Overall, the response rate to treatment for patients who completed a trial was 63.2% for SSRIs and 68.2% for TCAs (P = 0.038). For the intention-to-treat groups, these rates dropped to 48.0 and 48.6% (P, NS), respectively. Significantly more TCA-treated than SSRI-treated subjects dropped out due to either lack of efficacy or adverse reactions (30.0 vs. 24.7%, P = 0.01). Patients taking SSRIs experienced significantly more gastrointestinal problems and sexual dysfunction, whereas treatment with TCAs produced significantly more complaints of sedation, dizziness, and anticholinergic symptoms.
在本分析中,我们研究了三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的相关研究,以比较其疗效和脱落率。我们还研究了所报告的副作用发生频率。利用医学在线数据库(Medline),我们找到了36项关于TCAs和SSRIs的双盲对照临床试验。我们对这些研究以及一个有更统一明确的结果标准的21项研究的亚组进行了荟萃分析。主要结果指标包括治疗完成者和意向性治疗组的疗效;因不良反应和缺乏疗效导致的脱落率;以及所报告的副作用。总体而言,完成试验的患者中,SSRIs治疗的有效率为63.2%,TCAs治疗的有效率为68.2%(P = 0.038)。对于意向性治疗组,这些比率分别降至48.0%和48.6%(P,无显著性差异)。因缺乏疗效或不良反应而退出试验的TCA治疗患者显著多于SSRI治疗患者(30.0%对24.7%,P = 0.01)。服用SSRIs的患者出现胃肠道问题和性功能障碍的情况显著更多,而TCAs治疗则导致更多关于镇静、头晕和抗胆碱能症状的主诉。