Apter A, Gothelf D, Offer R, Ratzoni G, Orbach I, Tyano S, Pfeffer C R
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Geha Psychiatric Hospital, Petah Tiqwa, Israel.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;36(11):1520-7. doi: 10.1016/S0890-8567(09)66560-6.
To identify defense mechanisms that characterize adolescents with a range of suicidal behaviors and to differentiate them from nonsuicidal adolescents.
Fifty-five suicidal adolescent inpatients admitted for a definite suicide attempt were compared with 87 adolescent inpatients who had no history of suicide attempt or ideation and 81 nonpatients. Defense mechanisms were assessed by the Ego Defense Scale (EDS) which is part of a larger semistructured interview, the Child Suicide Potential Scale (CSPS), and by a self-report questionnaire, the Life Style Index (LSI). The CSPS was also used to quantity violent and suicidal behaviors.
On the LSI suicidal adolescent patients scored higher on denial, displacement, repression, and total defenses than the nonpatients. On the EDS they scored higher on regression, denial, projection, introjection, repression, and total defenses and lower on sublimation. LSI scores on displacement (higher) and on compensation (lower) distinguished suicidal from nonsuicidal inpatients. Denial and regression correlated positively and sublimation correlated negatively with both suicidal and violent behaviors. Introjection and repression correlated with suicidal behavior only.
Overuse of displacement is connected with increased risk for suicidal and aggressive behaviors, while sublimation is probably a protective factor. In addition, several immature ego defenses possibly amplify aggression, which then is directed against the self by the maladaptive overuse of introjection, displacement, and repression.
确定具有一系列自杀行为的青少年的防御机制特征,并将他们与非自杀青少年区分开来。
将55名因明确的自杀未遂而住院的自杀青少年患者与87名无自杀未遂或自杀意念病史的青少年住院患者以及81名非患者进行比较。通过自我防御量表(EDS)评估防御机制,该量表是更大的半结构化访谈即儿童自杀潜力量表(CSPS)的一部分,同时还通过一份自我报告问卷即生活方式指数(LSI)进行评估。CSPS也用于量化暴力和自杀行为。
在LSI上,自杀青少年患者在否认、转移、压抑和总体防御方面的得分高于非患者。在EDS上,他们在退行、否认、投射、内摄、压抑和总体防御方面得分较高,而在升华方面得分较低。LSI在转移(较高)和补偿(较低)方面的得分区分了自杀和非自杀住院患者。否认和退行与自杀及暴力行为呈正相关,升华与自杀及暴力行为呈负相关。内摄和压抑仅与自杀行为相关。
过度使用转移与自杀和攻击行为风险增加有关,而升华可能是一个保护因素。此外,几种不成熟的自我防御可能会放大攻击性,然后通过对内摄、转移和压抑的适应不良过度使用而将其指向自身。