Weil T P
Bedford Health Associates, Inc., Asheville, NC, USA.
J Health Care Finance. 1998 Winter;24(2):56-64.
An almost unending debate over the future shape of America's health care system increasingly focuses on the continuum between managed competition and government regulations, and the question: What is right for the United States? The Maryland all-payer, rate setting system for its 50 hospitals, where over a third of the state's population is enrolled in managed care plans, is used as an example of relatively successful blending of competitive and regulatory strategies. This article concludes with the theme that given America's penchant for compromise, competitive and regulatory approaches can coexist in a pluralistic health system that constrains the use of services and costs, and enhances access and the quality of patient care.
关于美国医疗保健系统未来形态的一场几乎永无休止的辩论,越来越聚焦于管理式竞争与政府监管之间的连续统一体,以及这个问题:什么对美国才是正确的?马里兰州针对其50家医院实行的全民付费、费率设定系统,该州超过三分之一的人口参加了管理式医疗保健计划,此系统被用作竞争与监管策略相对成功融合的一个例子。本文的结论是,鉴于美国对妥协的偏好,竞争和监管方法能够在一个多元的医疗系统中共存,这个系统既能限制服务的使用和成本,又能提高医疗可及性和患者护理质量。