Suppr超能文献

经皮腔内斑块旋切术治疗急性和长期预后的预测因素:冠状动脉介入治疗新方法(NACI)注册研究

Predictors of acute and long-term outcome with transluminal extraction atherectomy: the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry.

作者信息

Sketch M H, Davidson C J, Yeh W, Margolis J R, Matthews R V, Moses J W, Pichard A D, Safian R D, O'Neill W, Siegel R M, Baim D S

机构信息

Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 20;80(10A):68K-77K. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00766-2.

Abstract

The New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry was established to define the role of new coronary devices in overcoming the limitations of balloon angioplasty. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the acute and long-term efficacy of the transluminal extraction catheter (TEC) device utilizing data from the NACI registry and identify clinical and anatomic patient subsets who may benefit from this device. From 1990-1994, >4,300 patients from 39 clinical sites enrolled consecutive patients treated with one of the 7 new devices to the NACI registry. The study population consists of 331 patients (385 lesions) treated with planned TEC as the sole new device. Of these patients, 243 (292 lesions) were treated for saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease and 88 (93 lesions) for native disease. Patients undergoing SVG treatment were older and more likely to be male. They had lower ventricular function, more unstable angina, and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure. Multivessel disease was more prevalent in the SVG cohort, as was evidence of thrombus before treatment. Although device success was achieved in 50% of SVG lesions and 41% of native lesions, lesion success was achieved in 90% and 78%, respectively, after adjunctive balloon angioplasty, and procedure success rates were 86% and 79%, respectively. The in-hospital major complication (death/Q-wave myocardial infarction/emergency coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery) rate was higher in the SVG cohort (6.2% vs 2.3%), mainly due to higher mortality rate (5.3% vs 1.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that SVG was not an independent predictor for either an in-hospital major complication or clinical failure. The risk factors for major in-hospital complications were history of congestive heart failure (odds ratio = 3.17) and thrombus (odds ratio = 3.36). For clinical failure the risk factors were diabetes (odds ratio = 1.88), thrombus (odds ratio = 2.08), and calcium (odds ratio = 3.09). One-year rates of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization were 51% in the SVG cohort and 41% in the native cohort. Following adjustment, patients treated for SVG disease did not have a higher risk when compared with those treated for native disease. The factors significantly associated with this composite event at 1 year are male (relative risk = 1.41), patients with history of congestive heart failure (relative risk = 1.56), and total occlusions (relative risk = 1.52). This study shows that for both SVG and native cohorts, device success rates were low with TEC alone, but acceptable lesion success rates were achieved when adjunctive PTCA was used. In-hospital as well as 1-year major complications were higher in the SVG cohort. However, after adjusting for other risk factors, SVG attempt was not significantly associated with either in-hospital or 1-year events.

摘要

冠状动脉介入新方法(NACI)注册研究旨在确定新型冠状动脉器械在克服球囊血管成形术局限性方面的作用。本研究的目的是利用NACI注册研究的数据评估腔内血栓抽吸导管(TEC)器械的急性和长期疗效,并确定可能从该器械中获益的临床和解剖学患者亚组。1990年至1994年,来自39个临床站点的4300多名患者连续入选NACI注册研究,这些患者接受了7种新型器械中的一种治疗。研究人群包括331例(385处病变)接受计划性TEC作为唯一新型器械治疗的患者。其中,243例(292处病变)接受了大隐静脉桥血管(SVG)疾病治疗,88例(93处病变)接受了原位病变治疗。接受SVG治疗的患者年龄较大,男性居多。他们的心室功能较低,不稳定型心绞痛更多,充血性心力衰竭的发生率更高。多支血管病变在SVG队列中更为普遍,治疗前血栓形成的证据也是如此。尽管50%的SVG病变和41%的原位病变实现了器械成功,但在辅助球囊血管成形术后,病变成功率分别为90%和78%,手术成功率分别为86%和79%。SVG队列的院内主要并发症(死亡/Q波心肌梗死/急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术[CABG]手术)发生率较高(6.2%对2.3%),主要是由于死亡率较高(5.3%对1.1%)。多变量分析显示,SVG不是院内主要并发症或临床失败的独立预测因素。院内主要并发症的危险因素是充血性心力衰竭病史(比值比=3.17)和血栓(比值比=3.36)。临床失败的危险因素是糖尿病(比值比=1.88)、血栓(比值比=2.08)和钙化(比值比=3.09)。SVG队列的1年死亡率、Q波心肌梗死率或任何再次血运重建率为51%,原位病变队列的为41%。调整后,接受SVG疾病治疗的患者与接受原位病变治疗的患者相比,风险并没有更高。与这一复合事件在1年时显著相关的因素是男性(相对风险=1.41)、有充血性心力衰竭病史的患者(相对风险=1.56)和完全闭塞病变(相对风险=1.52)。本研究表明,对于SVG和原位病变队列,单独使用TEC时器械成功率较低,但使用辅助性经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)时可获得可接受的病变成功率。SVG队列的院内及1年主要并发症较高。然而,在调整其他危险因素后,SVG尝试与院内或1年事件均无显著相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验