Suppr超能文献

晚期结直肠癌的全身治疗选择:5-氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙的应用前景

Systemic treatment options in advanced colorectal cancer: perspectives on combination 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin.

作者信息

Grem J L

机构信息

Developmental Therapeutics Department, Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889-5105, USA.

出版信息

Semin Oncol. 1997 Oct;24(5 Suppl 18):S18-8-S18-18.

PMID:9420016
Abstract

A variety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- based chemotherapy regimens have been investigated in colorectal cancer patients in randomized trials over the past decade. The standard regimen for treatment of colorectal cancer is combination 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV). The results from 12 randomized trials indicate that 5-FU/LV is more active than single-agent 5-FU (25% v 14% of evaluable patients); however, median survival was unchanged (12.2 months v 11.4 months, respectively). Furthermore, the weekly and monthly schedules of 5-FU/LV are therapeutically equivalent, although the spectrum of toxicity differs. On the monthly schedule, a LV dose of 200 mg/m2 appears to have no advantage over 20 mg/m2; however, on the weekly schedule, high-dose LV appeared to be slightly more effective than low-dose LV (2-hour infusion) (25% v 18%) at the cost of a higher incidence of severe diarrhea (26% v 14%). Furthermore, similar response rates are observed with the racemic commercial formulation of LV and the pure (I-LV) active stereoisomer. Other modulatory strategies that appear to produce higher response rates than single-agent intravenous push 5-FU include sequential methotrexate/5-FU (19% v 10%) and continuous infusion schedules (22% v 14%). Although 5-FU-modulated strategies improve response rates over those observed with single-agent 5-FU, median survival in multi-institutional trials unfortunately has not generally exceeded 12 months. The mechanism of action, clinical activity, and toxicity of single-agent 5-FU and 5-FU-modulated regimens are reviewed.

摘要

在过去十年中,已在随机试验中对多种基于5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的化疗方案用于结直肠癌患者进行了研究。治疗结直肠癌的标准方案是5-FU联合亚叶酸(LV)。12项随机试验的结果表明,5-FU/LV比单药5-FU更具活性(可评估患者分别为25%对14%);然而,中位生存期未变(分别为12.2个月对11.4个月)。此外,5-FU/LV的每周和每月给药方案在治疗效果上相当,尽管毒性谱有所不同。在每月给药方案中,200 mg/m²的LV剂量似乎并不比20 mg/m²有优势;然而,在每周给药方案中,高剂量LV似乎比低剂量LV(2小时输注)略有效(25%对18%),代价是严重腹泻的发生率更高(26%对14%)。此外,LV的消旋商业制剂和纯(I-LV)活性立体异构体的反应率相似。其他似乎比单药静脉推注5-FU产生更高反应率的调节策略包括序贯甲氨蝶呤/5-FU(19%对10%)和持续输注方案(22%对14%)。尽管5-FU调节策略比单药5-FU观察到的反应率有所提高,但多机构试验中的中位生存期不幸一般未超过12个月。本文综述了单药5-FU和5-FU调节方案的作用机制、临床活性和毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验