Suppr超能文献

评估溶栓时代急性心肌梗死后的预后。

Assessing prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era.

作者信息

Gimple L W, Beller G A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 1994 Mar-Apr;1(2 Pt 1):198-209. doi: 10.1007/BF02984092.

Abstract

The use of physiologic testing for prognostication continues to be useful and widely applied in the predischarge evaluation of patients recovering from an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Because patients with abnormal exercise test results are now routinely sent for angiography, there are no randomized trials or experimental confirmation that exercise parameters are still associated with the same prognostic value in the thrombolytic era. Nevertheless, the excellent outcomes in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy and risk stratified with exercise testing provide strong empiric support for the continued use of noninvasive testing of patients without complications after thrombolytic therapy. Reviews of patient cohorts enrolled in trials of thrombolytic therapy show that these patients have a lower incidence of multivessel disease and less evidence of ischemia (ST segment depression or thallium 201 redistribution) compared with prethrombolytic cohorts. For this and other reasons, the sensitivity and specificity of exercise variables for prognosis or detection of multivessel disease are not as strong. The addition of perfusion imaging will enhance the sensitivity for detection of ischemia within or remote from the infarct zone and will provide information regarding viability. Patients who are unable to exercise or those with poor exercise tolerance, an abnormal exercise blood pressure response, inducible ischemia, or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are candidates for further invasive evaluation and consideration for coronary revascularization. With 201Tl imaging, evidence for increased pulmonary uptake of the tracer is indicative of high risk and a high probability of an adverse outcome with medical therapy. Low-risk patients are those who achieve their target heart rate or work load without inducible angina, ST segment depression, reversible perfusion abnormalities, or increased lung 201Tl uptake. Defect size is reflective of infarct size, and patients with extensive areas of nonreversible hypoperfusion are also at high risk for future events even in the absence of ischemia. Finally, pharmacologic stress imaging with dipyridamole, adenosine, or dobutamine has been found to be safe when employed for stress testing soon after uncomplicated infarction.

摘要

在溶栓时代,生理测试用于预后评估在无并发症的急性心肌梗死恢复期患者的出院前评估中仍然有用且应用广泛。由于运动试验结果异常的患者现在通常会接受血管造影检查,因此没有随机试验或实验证实运动参数在溶栓时代仍具有相同的预后价值。然而,接受溶栓治疗并通过运动试验进行风险分层的患者取得的良好结果为溶栓治疗后无并发症患者继续使用非侵入性测试提供了有力的经验支持。对参加溶栓治疗试验的患者队列的回顾表明,与溶栓前队列相比,这些患者多支血管疾病的发生率较低,缺血(ST段压低或铊201再分布)的证据也较少。出于这个原因和其他原因,运动变量对预后或多支血管疾病检测的敏感性和特异性并不那么强。灌注成像的加入将提高对梗死区内或梗死区外缺血检测的敏感性,并将提供有关存活能力的信息。无法运动或运动耐量差、运动血压反应异常、诱发缺血或非持续性室性心动过速的患者是进一步进行侵入性评估和考虑冠状动脉血运重建的候选者。使用铊201成像时,示踪剂肺摄取增加的证据表明风险高,药物治疗不良结局的可能性大。低风险患者是那些在没有诱发心绞痛、ST段压低、可逆性灌注异常或肺铊201摄取增加的情况下达到目标心率或工作量的患者。缺损大小反映梗死大小,即使没有缺血,大面积不可逆性灌注减低的患者未来发生事件的风险也很高。最后,已发现使用双嘧达莫、腺苷或多巴酚丁胺进行药物负荷成像在无并发症梗死不久后用于负荷试验时是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验