Worthington P, Rubenstein J E
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Jan;42(1):129-60.
A range of treatment options has been presented regarding the use of dental implants to rehabilitate patients who otherwise have compromised function using conventional tissue-borne prostheses. This patient population offers significant challenges to both the surgeon and the prosthodontist. Generally speaking, IODs retained on two or more endosteal osseointegrated implants; transosteal, subperiosteal, ramus frame implant-supported and implant-retained prostheses, and a totally implant-supported design offer options to treat the severely atrophic mandible. When bone support or volume is so lacking that augmentation procedures are required, bone grafting can be considered as a treatment option. The state-of-the-art of implant treatment for the atrophic mandible offers to the dental professional and patient a variety of options. Thus far, it is too early to make specific recommendations as to which treatment offers the best option for each patient. It is fair to say that the ISP remains the gold standard against which other treatments can be compared.
关于使用牙种植体修复那些使用传统组织支持式假体功能受损患者的治疗方案已经有很多。这类患者群体给外科医生和口腔修复医生都带来了巨大挑战。一般来说,固定在两个或更多骨内骨整合种植体上的覆盖义齿;穿骨式、骨膜下、下颌支支架种植体支持和种植体固位假体,以及完全种植体支持设计为治疗严重萎缩性下颌骨提供了选择。当骨支持或骨量严重不足以至于需要进行增量手术时,可以考虑骨移植作为一种治疗选择。萎缩性下颌骨种植治疗的最新技术为牙科专业人员和患者提供了多种选择。到目前为止,就哪种治疗方法对每个患者是最佳选择做出具体建议还为时过早。可以说,种植体支持式义齿仍然是可以与其他治疗方法进行比较的金标准。