Redon J
Hypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine, Hospital Clinico, University of Valencia, Spain.
Drugs. 1997 Dec;54(6):857-66. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754060-00005.
There has been increasing interest in the question of whether microalbuminuria can be used in the risk stratification of patients with essential hypertension. A cluster of cardiovascular and/or renal risk factors may be associated with microalbuminuria in hypertension. Despite this, prospective data about the potential role of microalbuminuria as a prognostic marker of cardiovascular and/or renal risk have been sparse and inconclusive until now. Blood pressure values have been considered the most important determinant of microalbuminuria in essential hypertension; however, hyperinsulinaemia--a metabolic component-was noted to be present in conjunction with high blood pressure. Furthermore, 2 other factors may be also related to microalbuminuria: salt sensitivity and renal structural changes (nephrosclerosis). We are now aware that the clinical and physiological implications of abnormal urinary albumin excretion (UAE) are much broader than anticipated, possibly involving haemodynamic, metabolic and vascular components overlapping several clinical syndromes. Achievement of short term UAE reduction with antihypertensive treatment depends on structural abnormalities established in the glomerulus, the extent of blood pressure reduction and the antihypertensive drug class used. In terms of UAE reduction, better results are obtained with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists such as losartan and valsartan, than with other antihypertensive classes, although their true impact in preserving renal function needs to be assessed. The capacity of new calcium antagonists, such as amlodipine, lacidipine or mibefradil, to reduce UAE also needs to be assessed further. Thus, microalbuminuria may be seen as an integrated marker of risk and should be assessed in recently diagnosed patients with essential hypertension. In microalbuminuric patients, the target should be to decrease blood pressure < 135/85 mm Hg, reduce salt intake to around 100 mmol/day and prescribe a low-calorie diet if obesity is present. ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists have more potential benefits than the other classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing UAE. Finally, a yearly assessment of microalbuminuria is recommended during treatment, to monitor the impact of therapy.
微量白蛋白尿是否可用于原发性高血压患者的风险分层这一问题已引发越来越多的关注。高血压患者中,一系列心血管和/或肾脏危险因素可能与微量白蛋白尿有关。尽管如此,迄今为止,关于微量白蛋白尿作为心血管和/或肾脏风险预后标志物的潜在作用的前瞻性数据一直很少且尚无定论。血压值一直被认为是原发性高血压中微量白蛋白尿的最重要决定因素;然而,人们注意到高胰岛素血症(一种代谢成分)与高血压同时存在。此外,另外两个因素也可能与微量白蛋白尿有关:盐敏感性和肾脏结构改变(肾硬化)。我们现在意识到,异常尿白蛋白排泄(UAE)的临床和生理意义比预期的要广泛得多,可能涉及血流动力学、代谢和血管成分,这些成分与几种临床综合征相互重叠。通过降压治疗实现短期内UAE降低取决于肾小球中已存在的结构异常、血压降低的程度以及所使用的降压药物类别。就降低UAE而言,与其他降压药物类别相比,使用ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素II拮抗剂(如氯沙坦和缬沙坦)能取得更好的效果,尽管它们在保护肾功能方面的真正影响尚需评估。新型钙拮抗剂(如氨氯地平、拉西地平和米贝拉地尔)降低UAE的能力也需要进一步评估。因此,微量白蛋白尿可被视为一种综合风险标志物,应在新诊断的原发性高血压患者中进行评估。对于微量白蛋白尿患者,目标应是将血压降至<135/85 mmHg,将盐摄入量减少至约100 mmol/天,如果存在肥胖则规定低热量饮食。在降低UAE方面,ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素II拮抗剂比其他类别的降压药物具有更多潜在益处。最后,建议在治疗期间每年对微量白蛋白尿进行评估,以监测治疗效果。