Rondinelli R D, Dunn W, Hassanein K M, Keesling C A, Meredith S C, Schulz T L, Lawrence N J
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Dec;78(12):1358-63. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90310-5.
To determine whether simulation of significant impairment of the hand will have a predictable impact on degree of functional loss at the wrist and hand.
Single subject repeat measures using before-after trial comparisons and healthy volunteer subjects.
Occupational therapy section of a large academic medical center.
Twenty adult volunteer student subjects from an occupational therapy education (OTE) department were included. All were between ages 18 and 43 years, right hand dominant, and in excellent general health. There were 19 women and 1 man, reflecting gender distribution of the OTE student body.
A simulated fusion of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the thumb was achieved by immobilization in an individually fabricated splint designed to maximally restrict motion at the first CMC joint. Impairment ratings (baseline vs splinted) according to the AMA Guides were obtained by Greenleaf testing, and upper extremity function was quantitatively assessed before and after splinting.
Measures of upper extremity function included grip and pinch strength, wrist torque, and speed of performance on the Valpar Small Tools test, Jebsen Hand Function test, and an exploratory measure, the Functional Life Activity Test (FLAT).
Significant impairments were achieved for all subjects after splinting and according to Greenleaf testing. Splinting resulted in significant reductions in grip and pinch strength, wrist torque, and significant slowing of performance on the Valpar, Jebsen, and FLAT tests. Regressions of degree of impairment on degree of functional loss after splinting, and according to each of the above measures, were not significant.
Impairment of the hand was simulated to a mild-to-moderate degree as measured according to the AMA Guides. This imposed significant reductions in motion at key joints of the wrist and hand as well as significant reductions in grip and pinch strength and wrist torque. A corresponding and significant slowing of performance on a variety of measures of upper extremity function of an industrial and nonindustrial nature was also seen. However, and for the first time, correlation and regression reveals that it is not possible to predict degree of functional loss attributable to degree of impairment for the hand. It thus appears that, for mild-to-moderate clinical impairments, the associated impairment rating is a poor estimator of functional loss at the hand and should be used cautiously, if at all, as a criterion for disability determination.
确定模拟手部严重功能障碍是否会对腕部和手部的功能丧失程度产生可预测的影响。
采用前后试验比较的单受试者重复测量研究,并纳入健康志愿者作为对照。
一家大型学术医疗中心的职业治疗科。
纳入了来自职业治疗教育(OTE)部门的20名成年志愿者学生。所有参与者年龄在18至43岁之间,以右手为主,身体健康状况良好。其中有19名女性和1名男性,反映了OTE学生群体的性别分布。
通过佩戴个体化制作的夹板固定,实现拇指腕掌(CMC)关节的模拟融合,该夹板旨在最大程度地限制第一CMC关节的活动。根据美国医学协会(AMA)指南,通过格林利夫测试获得损伤评级(基线与夹板固定后),并在夹板固定前后对上肢功能进行定量评估。
上肢功能测量包括握力、捏力、腕部扭矩,以及在瓦尔帕小工具测试、杰布森手功能测试和一项探索性测量——功能生活活动测试(FLAT)中的表现速度。
夹板固定后,根据格林利夫测试,所有受试者均出现了显著的功能障碍。夹板固定导致握力、捏力、腕部扭矩显著降低,并且在瓦尔帕、杰布森和FLAT测试中的表现显著减慢。根据上述各项测量指标,夹板固定后损伤程度与功能丧失程度之间的回归分析均无显著意义。
根据AMA指南测量,手部功能障碍被模拟到轻度至中度程度。这导致腕部和手部关键关节的活动显著减少,以及握力、捏力和腕部扭矩显著降低。在各种工业和非工业性质的上肢功能测量中,也观察到相应的显著表现减慢。然而,首次通过相关性和回归分析发现,无法根据手部损伤程度预测功能丧失程度。因此,对于轻度至中度的临床损伤,相关的损伤评级似乎是手部功能丧失的一个较差的估计指标,若将其作为残疾判定标准,应谨慎使用,甚至根本不应使用。