Stegall M D, Simon M, Wachs M E, Chan L, Nolan C, Kam I
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80262, USA.
Transplantation. 1997 Dec 27;64(12):1695-700. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199712270-00011.
Historically, the acute rejection rates in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients have been extremely high (50-80%), with many second and third rejection episodes despite the use of quadruple immunosuppression (antibody induction and cyclosporine [CsA]-azathioprine [AZA]-based maintenance immunosuppression). Although this acute rejection has rarely led to graft loss, it has been a great cause of morbidity and of significantly increased cost. In an attempt to decrease the acute rejection rate and related morbidity in SPK transplant recipients, we compared two "state-of-the-art" immunosuppression regimens in a prospective, randomized, single-center study.
Patients who received SPK transplants were randomized to receive either tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=18) or CsA (Neoral formulation) and MMF (n=18). All patients received OKT3 induction and prednisone, which was tapered to 5 mg/day by 6 months after transplantation. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven. In addition, metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, serum cholesterol), drug toxicity, and infection also were measured. Data were compared with that of a historical group (n=18) who received conventional CsA (Sandimmune formulation) and AZA-based immunosuppression.
The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11% in both the TAC-MMF and CsA-MMF groups with only two patients in each group experiencing a rejection episode. This rejection rate was significantly decreased from that of the CsA-AZA historical group (77%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in infection rates, including cytomegalovirus, or in metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, and cholesterol levels). All patients remained on their initial immunosuppression regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Between 3 and 6 months after transplantation, three patients were switched from TAC to CsA for recurrent migraine headaches, posttransplant diabetes, and chronic cytomegalovirus infection. Two patients in the CsA-MMF group died of nonimmunologic causes (aspiration pneumonia and arrhythmia) between 3 and 6 months after transplantation.
The data from this study show that MMF treatment significantly decreases the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in SPK transplant recipients compared with AZA-treated historical controls. In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control.
从历史上看,胰肾联合移植(SPK)受者的急性排斥反应发生率极高(50%-80%),尽管使用了四联免疫抑制方案(抗体诱导以及基于环孢素[CsA] -硫唑嘌呤[AZA]的维持性免疫抑制),仍有许多患者发生二次和三次排斥反应。虽然这种急性排斥反应很少导致移植物丢失,但它一直是发病的重要原因,且成本显著增加。为了降低SPK移植受者的急性排斥反应发生率及相关发病率,我们在一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究中比较了两种“先进的”免疫抑制方案。
接受SPK移植的患者被随机分为接受他克莫司(TAC)和霉酚酸酯(MMF,n = 18)组或CsA(新山地明制剂)和MMF(n = 18)组。所有患者均接受OKT3诱导治疗和泼尼松治疗,移植后6个月时泼尼松逐渐减量至5mg/天。所有排斥反应均经活检证实。此外,还测量了代谢控制情况(糖化血红蛋白、高血压、血清胆固醇)、药物毒性和感染情况。将数据与接受传统CsA(山地明制剂)和基于AZA的免疫抑制的历史对照组(n = 18)的数据进行比较。
TAC - MMF组和CsA - MMF组经活检证实的急性排斥反应发生率均为11%,每组仅有两名患者发生排斥反应。该排斥反应发生率较CsA - AZA历史对照组(77%)显著降低(P<0.01)。在感染率方面,包括巨细胞病毒感染率,以及代谢控制情况(糖化血红蛋白、高血压和胆固醇水平)方面,均无显著差异。所有患者在移植后的前3个月均维持初始免疫抑制方案。在移植后3至6个月期间,3名患者因复发性偏头痛、移植后糖尿病和慢性巨细胞病毒感染从TAC转换为CsA。CsA - MMF组有两名患者在移植后3至6个月期间死于非免疫性原因(吸入性肺炎和心律失常)。
本研究数据表明,与接受AZA治疗的历史对照组相比,MMF治疗可显著降低SPK移植受者经活检证实的急性排斥反应发生率。此外,我们得出结论,TAC和CsA(新山地明)与MMF联合使用时,产生的急性排斥反应发生率相似且较低,移植物功能和代谢控制情况也相似。