Wijdicks E F, Kokmen E, O'Brien P C
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;64(1):117-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.1.117.
Neurological deterioration in alert patients with an acute CNS disorder can be subtle, but current coma scales may not clearly capture changes in level of alertness. Many coma scales include components such as eye opening and content of speech, features that are difficult to assess in intubated patients and patients with facial trauma. Two new tools have been devised by the authors. The components are a continuous performance test (patient is asked to raise his hand every time he hears a certain letter in a standardised sentence) and the three consecutive hand position test ("thumbs up-fist-victory sign"). Variation within and between observers was assessed with three neurologists, two junior neurology residents, and two neuroscience nurses, and compared with the Glasgow coma score. The average agreements had comparable ranges for both scores, 65% to 89% for both tests and 60% to 88% for the Glasgow coma score. On the first visit 49% of all tests with a maximum Glasgow coma score had a negative continuous performance test as opposed to 13% of tests with a less than maximum Glasgow coma score. For the consecutive hand position test, these numbers were respectively 25% and 2%. These tests may be a reasonable alternative to the Glasgow coma score to monitor patients, in particular when the verbal and eye response cannot be reliably tested.
急性中枢神经系统疾病清醒患者的神经功能恶化可能很细微,但目前的昏迷量表可能无法清晰捕捉到警觉水平的变化。许多昏迷量表包含诸如睁眼和言语内容等项目,这些特征在插管患者和面部创伤患者中难以评估。作者设计了两种新工具。其项目包括连续作业测试(要求患者在听到标准化句子中的某个特定字母时举手)和连续三次手部姿势测试(“竖起大拇指 - 握拳 - 胜利手势”)。由三位神经科医生、两位初级神经科住院医师和两位神经科学护士评估观察者内部和之间的差异,并与格拉斯哥昏迷评分进行比较。两种评分的平均一致性范围相当,两项测试均为65%至89%,格拉斯哥昏迷评分为60%至88%。首次就诊时,格拉斯哥昏迷评分最高的所有测试中有49%的连续作业测试结果为阴性,而格拉斯哥昏迷评分低于最高分的测试中这一比例为13%。对于连续手部姿势测试,这些数字分别为25%和2%。这些测试可能是监测患者时替代格拉斯哥昏迷评分的合理选择,特别是在无法可靠测试言语和眼部反应时。