Park D S, Morris E J, Stefanis L, Troy C M, Shelanski M L, Geller H M, Greene L A
Department of Pathology, Taub Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research, New York, New York 10032, USA.
J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):830-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-00830.1998.
Here, we compare the pathways by which DNA-damaging agents, NGF deprivation, and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) depletion evoke apoptosis of sympathetic neurons. Previous work raised the hypothesis that cell cycle signaling plays a required role in neuronal apoptosis elicited by NGF deprivation and the DNA-damaging agent camptothecin. To test this hypothesis, we extended our investigation of DNA-damaging agents to cytosine arabinoside (AraC) and UV irradiation. As with NGF deprivation and camptothecin treatment, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors flavopiridol and olomoucine protected neurons from apoptosis induced by AraC and UV treatment. These observations support the model that camptothecin, AraC, and UV treatment cause DNA damage, which leads to apoptosis by a mechanism that, as in the case of NGF deprivation, includes activation of cell cycle components. Flavopiridol and olomoucine, however, had no effect on death induced by SOD1 depletion, suggesting that CDKs do not play a role in this paradigm of neuronal death. To compare further the mechanisms of death evoked by NGF withdrawal, SOD1 depletion, and DNA-damaging agents, we investigated their responses to inhibitors of cysteine aspartases, elements of apoptotic pathways. The V-ICEinh and BAF, two peptide inhibitors of cysteine aspartases, protected neurons in all three death paradigms. In contrast, the cysteine aspartase inhibitory peptide zVAD-fmk conferred protection from NGF withdrawal and SOD1 depletion, but not DNA-damaging agents, whereas acYVAD-cmk protected only from SOD1 depletion. Taken together, these findings indicate that three different apoptotic stimuli activate separate pathways of death in the same neuron type.
在此,我们比较了DNA损伤剂、神经生长因子(NGF)剥夺和超氧化物歧化酶1(SOD1)缺失引发交感神经元凋亡的途径。先前的研究提出了一个假设,即细胞周期信号传导在NGF剥夺和DNA损伤剂喜树碱引发的神经元凋亡中起必要作用。为了验证这一假设,我们将对DNA损伤剂的研究扩展至阿糖胞苷(AraC)和紫外线照射。与NGF剥夺和喜树碱处理一样,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂黄酮哌啶醇和olomoucine可保护神经元免受AraC和紫外线处理诱导的凋亡。这些观察结果支持了这样一种模型,即喜树碱、AraC和紫外线处理会导致DNA损伤,进而通过一种机制引发凋亡,这种机制与NGF剥夺的情况一样,包括细胞周期成分的激活。然而,黄酮哌啶醇和olomoucine对SOD1缺失诱导的死亡没有影响,这表明细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶在这种神经元死亡模式中不起作用。为了进一步比较NGF撤除、SOD1缺失和DNA损伤剂引发的死亡机制,我们研究了它们对半胱天冬酶抑制剂(凋亡途径的组成部分)的反应。两种半胱天冬酶肽抑制剂V-ICEinh和BAF在所有三种死亡模式中均能保护神经元。相比之下,半胱天冬酶抑制肽zVAD-fmk可保护神经元免受NGF撤除和SOD1缺失的影响,但对DNA损伤剂无效,而acYVAD-cmk仅能保护神经元免受SOD1缺失的影响。综上所述,这些发现表明,三种不同的凋亡刺激在同一神经元类型中激活了不同的死亡途径。