Jones M E, Bashford G M, Mann J M
Institute of Rehabilitation and Allied Health, Port Kembla Hospital, Warrawong, NSW, Australia.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1997 Dec;21(3):183-6. doi: 10.3109/03093649709164553.
The purpose of this study was to review the clinical utility of static weight bearing (SWB) and maximal self-selected ambulatory velocity as objective quantifiable measures in an outpatient lower limb prosthetic clinic. Seventy-three (n = 73) consecutive trans-tibial (TTA) and trans-femoral amputees (TFA) attending an outpatient prosthetic clinic were studied. Prosthetic weight bearing was measured on a bathroom scale (mass in kg), normalised to body mass then expressed as a percentage and labelled static weight bearing (SWB). Maximum safe self-selected ambulatory velocity over a 10 metre level walkway (m/s) was measured with a stopwatch. The SWB mean for the TTA group was 94.93% range 77-100%) and 88.36% for the TFA group (range 43-100%). The mean ambulatory velocity was 1.70 m/s (range 0.07-5.75) for the TTA group and 0.78 m/s (range 0.10-1.54) for the TFA group. A statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) was found between SWB and ambulatory velocity in trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees in this study. A ceiling effect was noted in the trans-tibial group with 42% achieving 100% SWB through their prosthetic limb so it was concluded that ambulatory velocity was the more sensitive measure in established trans-tibial prosthetic limb users. SWB may be the more appropriate quantifiable measure for use in established trans-femoral prosthesis users. Prosthetic training programmes would benefit from the objective measurement of SWB. Once optimal SWB was achieved, ambulatory velocity would be the more sensitive measure of prosthetic use.
