Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 1;128(3):165-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-3-199802010-00001.
Uncertainty exists about the suitability of oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin therapy for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
To assess and compare response to sulfonylurea, insulin, or metformin over 6 years in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in whom disease could and could not be controlled with diet therapy alone.
Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Outpatient diabetes clinics of 15 hospitals in the United Kingdom.
Sulfonylurea (chlorpropamide or glyburide), insulin, or metformin (if patients were obese).
458 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet and had hyperglycemic symptoms or fasting plasma glucose levels greater than 15 mmol/L during the initial 3 months of diet therapy (primary diet failure group) and 1620 patients in whom disease was controlled by diet therapy and who had fasting plasma glucose levels of 6 to 15 mmol/L and no hyperglycemic symptoms while receiving diet therapy alone.
Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin, hemoglobin A1c concentrations, body weight, and therapy required.
Compared with the diet-controlled group, the primary diet failure group was younger and less obese and had more retinopathy, lower fasting plasma insulin levels, and reduced beta-cell function. At 6 years, patients allocated to insulin had lower fasting plasma glucose levels than did patients allocated to oral agents, but hemoglobin A1c concentrations were similar. Forty-eight percent (95% CI, 37% to 58%) of patients in the primary diet failure group maintained hemoglobin A1c concentrations less than 0.08. By 6 years, 51% of patients (CI, 42% to 62%) allocated to ultralente insulin required additional short-acting insulin and 66% of patients (CI, 58% to 73%) allocated to sulfonylurea required additional therapy with metformin or insulin to control symptoms and maintain fasting plasma glucose levels less than 15 mmol/L. Patients allocated to insulin gained more weight and had more hypoglycemic attacks than did patients allocated to sulfonylurea. Obese patients allocated to metformin gained the least weight and had the fewest hypoglycemic attacks. For all therapies, control achieved at 6 years was worse in the primary diet failure group than in the diet-controlled group.
Because initial insulin therapy induced more hypoglycemic reactions and weight gain without necessarily providing better control, it may be reasonable to start with oral agents and change to insulin if goals for glycemic levels are not achieved.
对于新诊断的2型糖尿病患者,口服降糖药和胰岛素治疗的适用性存在不确定性。
评估并比较新诊断的2型糖尿病患者在6年时间里对磺脲类药物、胰岛素或二甲双胍的反应,这些患者的疾病单用饮食疗法可控制或不可控制。
多中心、随机、对照试验。
英国15家医院的门诊糖尿病诊所。
磺脲类药物(氯磺丙脲或格列本脲)、胰岛素或二甲双胍(如果患者肥胖)。
458例新诊断的2型糖尿病患者,在最初3个月的饮食治疗期间单用饮食无法控制且有高血糖症状或空腹血糖水平大于15 mmol/L(原发性饮食失败组),以及1620例疾病通过饮食疗法得到控制的患者,他们在单用饮食治疗时空腹血糖水平为6至15 mmol/L且无高血糖症状。
空腹血糖和胰岛素水平、糖化血红蛋白浓度、体重以及所需治疗。
与饮食控制组相比,原发性饮食失败组患者更年轻、肥胖程度更低,视网膜病变更多,空腹血浆胰岛素水平更低,β细胞功能降低。6年后,分配接受胰岛素治疗的患者空腹血糖水平低于分配接受口服药物治疗的患者,但糖化血红蛋白浓度相似。原发性饮食失败组中48%(95%CI,37%至58%)的患者糖化血红蛋白浓度维持在小于0.08。到6年时,分配接受长效胰岛素治疗的患者中有51%(CI,42%至62%)需要额外的短效胰岛素,分配接受磺脲类药物治疗的患者中有66%(CI,58%至73%)需要额外使用二甲双胍或胰岛素治疗以控制症状并维持空腹血糖水平小于15 mmol/L。分配接受胰岛素治疗的患者比分配接受磺脲类药物治疗的患者体重增加更多且低血糖发作更频繁。分配接受二甲双胍治疗的肥胖患者体重增加最少且低血糖发作最少。对于所有治疗方法,原发性饮食失败组6年时达到的控制情况比饮食控制组差。
由于初始胰岛素治疗引发更多低血糖反应和体重增加,且不一定能提供更好的控制,因此先使用口服药物治疗,若未达到血糖水平目标再改用胰岛素治疗可能是合理的。