Ursin G, Astrahan M A, Salane M, Parisky Y R, Pearce J G, Daniels J R, Pike M C, Spicer D V
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 Jan;7(1):43-7.
We previously reported reductions in mammographic densities in women participating in a trial of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA)-based regimen for breast cancer prevention. In our previous report, we compared (by simultaneous evaluation) three basic elements of mammographic densities. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether a standard (expert) method of measuring mammographic densities would detect such changes in densities and whether a novel nonexpert computer-based threshold method could do so. Mammograms were obtained from 19 women at baseline and 12 months after randomization to the GnRHA-based regimen. The extent of mammographic densities was determined by: (a) a standard expert outlining method developed by Wolfe and his colleagues (Am. J. Roentgenol., 148: 1087-1092, 1987); and (b) a new computer-based threshold method of determining densities. The results from both the expert outlining method and the computer-based threshold method were highly consistent with the results of our original (simultaneous evaluation) method. All three methods yielded statistically significant reductions in densities from baseline to the 12-month follow-up mammogram in women on the contraceptive regimen. The difference between the treated and the control group was statistically significant with the expert outlining method and was of borderline statistical significance with the computer-based threshold method. The computer-based results correlated highly (r > 0.85) with the results from the expert outlining method. Both the standard expert outlining method and the computer-based threshold method detected the reductions we had previously noted in mammographic densities induced by the GnRHA-based regimen.
我们之前报道过,参与一项基于促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHA)方案预防乳腺癌试验的女性,其乳房X线摄影密度有所降低。在我们之前的报告中,我们(通过同步评估)比较了乳房X线摄影密度的三个基本要素。本研究的目的是评估一种标准(专家)测量乳房X线摄影密度的方法是否能检测到密度的这种变化,以及一种新的基于非专家的计算机阈值方法是否也能做到。在基线时以及随机分配到基于GnRHA方案后的12个月,从19名女性身上获取了乳房X线照片。乳房X线摄影密度的范围通过以下方式确定:(a)由沃尔夫及其同事开发的标准专家勾勒方法(《美国放射学杂志》,148: 1087 - 1092,1987年);以及(b)一种新的基于计算机的确定密度的阈值方法。专家勾勒方法和基于计算机的阈值方法的结果与我们原始(同步评估)方法的结果高度一致。对于采用避孕方案的女性,从基线到12个月随访乳房X线照片,所有三种方法都显示密度有统计学意义的降低。采用专家勾勒方法时,治疗组与对照组之间的差异具有统计学意义,而采用基于计算机的阈值方法时,差异具有临界统计学意义。基于计算机的结果与专家勾勒方法的结果高度相关(r > 0.85)。标准专家勾勒方法和基于计算机的阈值方法都检测到了我们之前所指出的基于GnRHA方案引起的乳房X线摄影密度降低。