Ruef M, Mendel P, Scott W R
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1998 Feb;32(6):775-803.
To draw together insights from three perspectives (health economics, organizational ecology, and institutional theory) in order to clarify the factors that influence entries of providers into healthcare markets. A model centered on the concept of an organizational field is advanced as the level of analysis best suited to examining the assortment and interdependence of organizational populations and the institutional forces that shape this co-evolution. In particular, the model argues that: (1) different populations of healthcare providers partition fiscal, geographic, and demographic resource environments in order to ameliorate competition and introduce service complementarities; and (2) competitive barriers to entry within populations of providers vary systematically with regulatory regimens.
County-level entries of hospitals and home health agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area using data from the American Hospital Association (1945-1991) and California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (1976-1991). Characteristics of the resource environment are derived from the Area Resource File (ARF) and selected government censuses.
A comparative design is applied to contrast influences on hospital and home health agency entries during the post-World War II period. Empirical estimates are obtained using Poisson and negative binomial regression models.
Hospital and HHA markets are partitioned primarily by the age and education of consumers and, to a lesser extent, by urbanization levels and public funding expenditures. Such resource partitioning allows independent HHAs to exist comfortably in concentrated hospital markets. For both hospitals and HHAs, the barriers to entry once generated by oligopolistic concentration have declined noticeably with the market-oriented reforms of the past 15 years.
A field-level perspective demonstrates that characteristics of local resource environments interact with interdependencies of provider populations and broader regulatory regimes to affect significantly the types of provider organizations likely to enter a given healthcare market.
整合来自健康经济学、组织生态学和制度理论这三个视角的见解,以阐明影响医疗服务提供者进入医疗市场的因素。提出一个以组织领域概念为核心的模型,作为最适合审视组织群体的分类及相互依存关系以及塑造这种共同演化的制度力量的分析层面。具体而言,该模型认为:(1)不同类型的医疗服务提供者划分财政、地理和人口资源环境,以缓和竞争并引入服务互补性;(2)提供者群体内部的进入竞争壁垒会随监管制度而系统性地变化。
利用美国医院协会(1945 - 1991年)和加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室(1976 - 1991年)的数据,获取旧金山湾区医院和家庭健康机构的县级进入数据。资源环境的特征源自区域资源文件(ARF)和选定的政府普查。
采用比较设计,对比二战后时期对医院和家庭健康机构进入的影响。使用泊松回归模型和负二项回归模型获得实证估计值。
医院和家庭健康机构市场主要按消费者的年龄和教育程度划分,在较小程度上按城市化水平和公共资金支出划分。这种资源划分使独立的家庭健康机构能够在集中的医院市场中舒适地存在。对于医院和家庭健康机构而言,过去15年的市场化改革使寡头垄断集中曾经造成的进入壁垒显著下降。
从领域层面的视角来看,地方资源环境的特征与提供者群体的相互依存关系以及更广泛的监管制度相互作用,显著影响可能进入特定医疗市场的提供者组织类型。