Jurkovicová O, Cagán S
IV. interná klinika Lekárskej fakulty Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave, Slovakia.
Bratisl Lek Listy. 1997 Jul-Aug;98(7-8):423-39.
Non-pharmacologic therapy has revolutionized the management of arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Of particular importance is the introduction of radiofrequent catheter ablation (RFCA) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). RFCA is effective and useful in the treatment and prevention of SCD, especially in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias related to dual or accessory atrioventricular pathways. There are some limitations in using this method in the prevention of SCD in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. RFCA is very successful, particularly in the treatment of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease. RFCA can be used as a palliative treatment of incessant or frequent VT before and after ICD implantation. Antibradycardia pacing decreases SCD not only by the removal of serious bradyarrhythmias but also by prevention of the occurrence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by bradyarrhythmia. Antitachycardia pacing is used in the prevention of SCD only as a part of ICD device. Implantation of an antitachycardia pacemaker as an isolated permanent treatment of tachycardias is currently almost not used. This method was replaced by RFCA in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and by ICD in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. ICD is a very perspective non-pharmacologic approach to SCD prevention, particularly as transvenous leads were introduced and device construction was simplified. ICD is indicated especially in patients with spontaneous sustained hemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and when antiarrhythmic drug treatment, RFCA or antitachycardia surgery are ineffective, intolerated, contraindicated or cannot be performed. ICD as the treatment of first choice instead of antiarrhythmic drugs as well as prophylactic ICD implantation in asymptomatic patients at high risk is a subject of discussion. ICD decreases the incidence of SCD significantly. However, the decrease in overall mortality was not verified. Antitachycardia surgery is less frequently used after RFCA, and ICD have been introduced. At present, this therapy is reserved only for the cases of failure of RFCA or the impossibility to use RFCA and ICD. Surgical therapy can be combined also with concommitant surgical correction of associated structural heart disease. Sympathectomy is used in prevention of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD in patients with congenital long Q-T syndrome. Selective left cardiac sympathetic denervation significantly reduces the risk of SCD in these patients but does not remove it completely. Heart transplantation is the last alternative of non-pharmacologic prevention of SCD. It is indicated in cases when all pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches have been exhausted. Heart transplantation is the only effective modality for the improvement of long-term prognosis in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and advanced chronic heart failure.
非药物治疗彻底改变了心律失常的管理和心脏性猝死(SCD)的预防。特别重要的是射频导管消融(RFCA)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的引入。RFCA在SCD的治疗和预防中有效且有用,尤其是在与双房室或房室旁道相关的室上性快速心律失常中。在使用这种方法预防室性快速心律失常的SCD方面存在一些局限性。RFCA非常成功,特别是在治疗束支折返性室性心动过速和无结构性心脏病患者的室性心动过速方面。RFCA可在ICD植入前后用作持续性或频繁室性心动过速(VT)的姑息治疗。抗心动过缓起搏不仅通过消除严重的心动过缓来降低SCD,还通过预防由心动过缓诱发的恶性室性快速心律失常的发生来降低SCD。抗心动过速起搏仅作为ICD装置的一部分用于预防SCD。目前几乎不使用植入抗心动过速起搏器作为快速心律失常的单独永久性治疗方法。在室上性快速心律失常中这种方法已被RFCA取代,在室性快速心律失常中已被ICD取代。ICD是预防SCD的一种非常有前景的非药物方法,特别是随着经静脉导线的引入和装置构造的简化。ICD尤其适用于自发持续性血流动力学显著的室性心动过速/心室颤动患者,以及抗心律失常药物治疗、RFCA或抗心动过速手术无效、不耐受、禁忌或无法进行的情况。ICD作为首选治疗方法而非抗心律失常药物以及在无症状高危患者中预防性植入ICD是一个有争议的话题。ICD显著降低了SCD的发生率。然而,总体死亡率的降低尚未得到证实。在RFCA和ICD引入后,抗心动过速手术的使用频率较低。目前,这种治疗仅保留用于RFCA失败或无法使用RFCA和ICD的情况。手术治疗也可与相关结构性心脏病的同期手术矫正相结合。交感神经切除术用于预防先天性长Q-T综合征患者的恶性室性快速心律失常和SCD。选择性左心交感神经切除术显著降低了这些患者SCD的风险,但不能完全消除。心脏移植是SCD非药物预防的最后一种选择。它适用于所有药物和非药物方法都已用尽的情况。心脏移植是改善恶性室性快速心律失常和晚期慢性心力衰竭患者长期预后的唯一有效方式。