Salama G, Miédougé M, Rouzaud P, Mauduyt M A, Pujazon M C, Vincent C, Carles P, Serre G
Department of Biology and Pathology of the Cell, INSERM CJF 96-02, Toulouse Purpan School of Medicine, University of Toulouse III, France.
Br J Cancer. 1998;77(3):472-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.75.
CYFRA 21-1 assay, measuring cytokeratin 19 fragments, was compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay, as an addition to cytological analysis for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Both markers were determined with commercial enzyme immunoassays in pleural fluid from 196 patients. Cytological analysis and/or pleural biopsy confirmed the malignant origin of the effusion in 99 patients (76 carcinomas, nine pleural mesotheliomas and 14 non-epithelial malignancies). Effusions were confirmed as benign in 97 patients (33 cardiac failures, 39 infectious diseases--including 12 tuberculosis-- and 25 miscellaneous effusions). Both markers were significantly higher in malignant than in benign effusions. All the patients with non-epithelial malignancies presented CYFRA and CEA values lower than the 95% diagnostic specificity thresholds (100 and 6 ng ml(-1) respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity in the group of carcinomas and mesotheliomas was similar for CYFRA (58.8%) and CEA (64.7%). However, CEA had a significantly higher sensitivity in carcinomas (72.4% vs 55.3%), while CYFRA had a clearly higher sensitivity in mesotheliomas (89.9% vs 0%). Interestingly, 12 out of the 16 malignant effusions with a negative cytology were CEA and/or CYFRA positive. Regarding their high diagnostic sensitivity and their complementarity, CEA and CYFRA appear to be very useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions when cytology is negative.
将检测细胞角蛋白19片段的CYFRA 21-1检测法与癌胚抗原(CEA)检测法进行比较,作为恶性胸腔积液诊断细胞学分析的补充。采用商用酶免疫分析法对196例患者的胸水进行了这两种标志物的检测。细胞学分析和/或胸膜活检证实99例患者(76例癌、9例胸膜间皮瘤和14例非上皮性恶性肿瘤)的胸腔积液为恶性来源。97例患者(33例心力衰竭、39例感染性疾病——包括12例结核病——以及25例其他积液)的胸腔积液被确认为良性。两种标志物在恶性胸腔积液中的水平均显著高于良性胸腔积液。所有非上皮性恶性肿瘤患者的CYFRA和CEA值均低于95%诊断特异性阈值(分别为100和6 ng ml⁻¹)。CYFRA(58.8%)和CEA(64.7%)在癌和间皮瘤组中的诊断敏感性相似。然而,CEA在癌中的敏感性显著更高(72.4%对55.3%),而CYFRA在间皮瘤中的敏感性明显更高(89.9%对0%)。有趣的是,16例细胞学检查阴性的恶性胸腔积液中有12例CEA和/或CYFRA呈阳性。鉴于其高诊断敏感性和互补性,当细胞学检查为阴性时,CEA和CYFRA在恶性胸腔积液的诊断中似乎非常有用。