Suppr超能文献

在马萨诸塞州东南部东部马脑炎病毒疫源地使用诱虫灯和人饵进行采样。

Sampling with light traps and human bait in epidemic foci for eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus in southeastern Massachusetts.

作者信息

Vaidyanathan R, Edman J D

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1997 Dec;13(4):348-55.

PMID:9474561
Abstract

To estimate human exposure to potential vectors of eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE) virus, we compared collections of putative EEE virus vectors from human biting collections with collections from CDC, AB (American Biophysics), and New Jersey light traps and resting boxes in enzootic/epidemic foci of EEE virus in southeastern Massachusetts. Human biting collections caught significantly more host-seeking females than resting boxes or unbaited light traps (P < 0.05). Regression analysis of human biting collections to AB traps supplemented with CO2 could predict 60-70% of the actual human biting risk by Aedes and Coquillettidia perturbans. The AB traps supplemented with CO2 and octenol could predict 65% of Anopheles biting risk. No single sampling method was accurate for predicting human biting risk by Culex salinarius, and no method could predict human biting risk by all potential vectors surveyed.

摘要

为了评估人类接触东部马脑炎(EEE)病毒潜在传播媒介的情况,我们将人类叮咬采集的假定EEE病毒传播媒介样本与来自疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)、美国生物物理公司(AB)以及马萨诸塞州东南部EEE病毒地方病/流行病疫源地的新泽西诱蚊灯和栖息箱采集的样本进行了比较。人类叮咬采集捕获到的寻找宿主的雌蚊显著多于栖息箱或未加诱饵的诱蚊灯(P < 0.05)。对补充了二氧化碳的AB诱蚊灯采集样本与人类叮咬采集样本进行回归分析,可以预测伊蚊和骚扰库蠓实际叮咬人类风险的60 - 70%。补充了二氧化碳和辛醇的AB诱蚊灯可以预测按蚊叮咬风险的65%。没有单一的采样方法能够准确预测盐泽库蚊叮咬人类的风险,也没有方法能够预测所有被调查潜在传播媒介叮咬人类的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验