Suppr超能文献

器械使用后的性能劣化:镍钛合金与不锈钢的对比

Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel.

作者信息

Zuolo M L, Walton R E

机构信息

Ensino Odontologico Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 1997 Jun;28(6):397-402.

PMID:9477904
Abstract

Nickel-titanium instruments purportedly resist deformation and loss of sharpness better than do stainless steel instruments but may be more susceptible to breakage. The processes of wear and breakage of nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments were examined. Sixty files of five types (12 each) and three manufacturers were used. All were used repeatedly in curved canals until failure or for a maximum of 22 minutes. Each instrument was examined with scanning electron microscopy both new (control) and at spaced intervals for evidence of wear and fatigue. All new instruments were of good quality. Stainless steel instrument tended to wear the most rapidly, and next were nickel-titanium rotary instruments; the most resistant to wear were nickel-titanium hand instruments. There were few instrument separations. In general, nickel-titanium (particularly hand) instruments resisted deterioration better than did stainless steel. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments (2 of 12) had the most breakage.

摘要

据称,镍钛器械比不锈钢器械更能抵抗变形和保持锋利度,但可能更容易折断。对镍钛器械和不锈钢器械的磨损及折断过程进行了研究。使用了来自三个制造商的五种类型(每种12支)共60支锉。所有器械都在弯曲根管中反复使用,直至出现故障或最多使用22分钟。每种器械在新的时候(对照)以及在不同时间间隔进行扫描电子显微镜检查,以寻找磨损和疲劳的证据。所有新器械质量良好。不锈钢器械磨损最快,其次是镍钛旋转器械;最耐磨的是镍钛手动器械。器械折断情况较少。总体而言,镍钛器械(尤其是手动器械)比不锈钢器械更能抵抗损坏。镍钛旋转器械(12支中有2支)折断情况最多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验