Kingswood S C, Kumamoto A T, Charter S J, Aman R A, Ryder O A
Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, CA 92112-0551, USA.
J Hered. 1998 Jan-Feb;89(1):96-100. doi: 10.1093/jhered/89.1.96.
Twenty-six captive individuals of the ellipsiprymnus subspecies group of Kobus ellipsiprymnus were found to have chromosomal complements of 2n = 50-52 (FN = 61-62), and 26 of the defassa subspecies group, including three specimens from Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya, had complements of 2n = 53-54 (FN = 62). G-banded karyotypes that were numbered according to the standard karyotype of Bos taurus revealed that variation in diploid number was the result of polymorphism for two independent centric (Robertsonian) fusions. The ellipsiprymnus group was polymorphic for a 7;11 centric fusion. Both elements of chromosome pairs 7 and 11 were fused in fusion homozygotes (2n = 50); in fusion heterozygotes (2n = 51), only one element of each pair was fused. The 7;11 fusion was lacking in specimens with 2n = 52. The defassa group was polymorphic for a 6;18 centric fusion; individuals were either heterozygous for the fusion (2n = 53) or lacking it (2n = 54). There were no defassa group individuals that were homozygous for the 6;18 fusion (2n = 52), but this may be a sampling artifact. The 6;18 fusion was fixed in the ellipsiprymnus group, whereas the 7;11 fusion was absent in the defassa group. In G- and C-banded karyotypes, all autosomal arms and the X chromosomes of the two subspecies groups appeared to be completely homologous. However, the Y chromosome was acrocentric in the ellipsiprymnus group and submetacentric in the defassa group, possibly the result of a pericentric inversion. Fixed chromosomal differences between the two subspecies groups reflect a period of supposed geographic isolation during which time they diverged genetically and phenotypically, and the centric fusion polymorphisms raise the possibility of reduced fertility in hybrids. These data, in conjunction with phenotypic and mitochondrial DNA data, suggest to us that populations of the ellipsiprymnus and defassa groups should be managed separately.
发现26只圈养的水羚椭圆亚种组个体的染色体组成为2n = 50 - 52(臂数 = 61 - 62),而26只德法萨亚种组个体,包括来自肯尼亚纳库鲁湖国家公园的3个样本,其染色体组成为2n = 53 - 54(臂数 = 62)。根据牛的标准核型进行编号的G带核型显示,二倍体数目的变异是两个独立的着丝粒(罗伯逊)融合多态性的结果。椭圆亚种组存在7;11着丝粒融合多态性。在融合纯合子(2n = 50)中,染色体对7和11的两个元件都发生了融合;在融合杂合子(2n = 51)中,每对元件中只有一个发生了融合。2n = 52的样本中不存在7;11融合。德法萨亚种组存在6;18着丝粒融合多态性;个体要么是融合杂合子(2n = 53),要么不存在这种融合(2n = 54)。没有德法萨亚种组个体是该6;18融合的纯合子(2n = 52),但这可能是抽样误差。6;18融合在椭圆亚种组中是固定的,而7;11融合在德法萨亚种组中不存在。在G带和C带核型中,两个亚种组的所有常染色体臂和X染色体似乎完全同源。然而,Y染色体在椭圆亚种组中是近端着丝粒的,在德法萨亚种组中是亚中着丝粒的,这可能是臂间倒位的结果。两个亚种组之间固定的染色体差异反映了一段假定的地理隔离期,在此期间它们在遗传和表型上发生了分化,着丝粒融合多态性增加了杂种育性降低的可能性。这些数据,结合表型和线粒体DNA数据,向我们表明椭圆亚种组和德法萨亚种组的种群应该分开管理。