Christ F, Gamble J, Gartside I B, Kox W J
Institute of Anaesthesiology, University of Munich, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jan;24(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s001340050509.
To investigate microvascular water permeability (filtration capacity, Kf) in patients with septic and non-septic shock using a new non-invasive method for studying microvascular parameters in man.
Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital.
We investigated 28 patients, presenting with cardio-vascular instability due to either septic shock, or non-septic shock (haemorrhage, multiple trauma, respiratory and/or cardiac failure).
We used standard invasive methods of monitoring (in-dwelling arterial lines and pulmonary artery flotation catheters) in combination with computer assisted venous congestion plethysmography (VCP) measurements, for a parallel assessment of peripheral microcirculatory parameters.
On admission to the ICU, patients with septic shock revealed a significantly higher mean value of filtration capacity Kf = 6.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3) (mean value +/- standard error of the mean, ml.min-1.100 ml tissue-1.mmHg-1 = KfU) than non-septic patients Kf = 3.5 +/- 0.3 KfU (p < 0.02). The Kf values of the septic patients were significantly higher than those from age-matched patients with peripheral vascular disease (4.1 +/- 0.2 KfU, p < 0.001) and those of healthy controls (4.3 +/- 0.2 KfU, p < 0.001); the Kf values of the non-septic patients, however, were not significantly different. The highest mean Kf value observed during the stay on ICU was Kfmax 11.6 +/- 0.2 KfU in the septic group and 5.7 +/- 0.1 KfU in the non-septic group (p < 0.001). Pvi, a value reflecting the balance of hydrostatic and oncotic forces in the microcirculation, was elevated in both patient groups. On admission, in septic patients Pvi was 39.2 +/- 3.3 mmHg and in non-septic patients 35.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg, these values were not significantly different, but significantly higher than the Pvi value of healthy controls (Pvi 21.5 +/- 0.8) (p < 0.001). A weak, however significant, positive correlation was found between Kf and Pvi in both patient groups. No correlations were found between Kf, as well as Pvi, and cardiac index (CI), oxygen delivery index (DO2I), oxygen consumption index (VO2I) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI).
An increase in permeability of microvessels will cause a loss of intravascular fluid and may therefore partially explain the large fluid requirements of patients in shock. It will also favour the development of oedema, which is often found in septic patients. We propose that changes in Kf are useful indices of microvascular malfunction and that VCP allows the non-invasive assessment of these parameters.
采用一种研究人体微血管参数的新型非侵入性方法,调查脓毒性休克和非脓毒性休克患者的微血管水通透性(滤过能力,Kf)。
一所大学医院的重症监护病房。
我们调查了28例因脓毒性休克或非脓毒性休克(出血、多发伤、呼吸和/或心力衰竭)而出现心血管不稳定的患者。
我们将标准侵入性监测方法(留置动脉导管和肺动脉漂浮导管)与计算机辅助静脉充血体积描记法(VCP)测量相结合,以并行评估外周微循环参数。
入住重症监护病房时,脓毒性休克患者的滤过能力Kf平均值显著高于非脓毒性休克患者,脓毒性休克患者Kf = 6.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-3)(平均值 +/- 平均标准误差,ml.min-1.100 ml组织-1.mmHg-1 = KfU),非脓毒性休克患者Kf = 3.5 +/- 0.3 KfU(p < 0.02)。脓毒性休克患者的Kf值显著高于年龄匹配的外周血管疾病患者(4.1 +/- 0.2 KfU,p < 0.001)和健康对照组(4.3 +/- 0.2 KfU,p < 0.001);然而,非脓毒性休克患者的Kf值无显著差异。在重症监护病房住院期间观察到的最高平均Kf值,脓毒性休克组为Kfmax 意为11.6 +/- 0.2 KfU,非脓毒性休克组为5.7 +/- 0.1 KfU(p < 0.001)。反映微循环中静水压和胶体渗透压平衡的Pvi值在两组患者中均升高。入院时,脓毒性休克患者的Pvi为39.2 +/- 3.3 mmHg,非脓毒性休克患者为35.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg,这些值无显著差异,但显著高于健康对照组的Pvi值(Pvi 21.5 +/- 0.8)(p < 0.001)。在两组患者中,Kf与Pvi之间均发现微弱但显著的正相关。未发现Kf、Pvi与心脏指数(CI)、氧输送指数(DO2I)、氧消耗指数(VO2I)和全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)之间存在相关性。
微血管通透性增加会导致血管内液体丢失,因此可能部分解释休克患者对大量液体的需求。这也有利于水肿的发展,水肿在脓毒性休克患者中很常见。我们认为Kf的变化是微血管功能障碍的有用指标,并且VCP允许对这些参数进行非侵入性评估。