Buss E, Hall J W, Grose J H
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7070, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Mar;103(3):1592-7. doi: 10.1121/1.421304.
The detection advantage associated with masker envelope coherence across frequency has typically been described in terms of comparisons of information across auditory channels. More recently it has been suggested that analysis of the output of a wider initial filter, similar to that suggested for the TMTF, can account for the data [B. G. Berg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1013-1023 (1996)]. This approach suggests that a change in envelope beats could serve as the cue to the addition of a pure-tone signal. Data are presented here for the detection of a tone added to multiple maskers with coherent envelopes. In one condition a change in envelope beats was an accurate potential cue, whereas in others the change was too unreliable to serve as an indicator of the presence of the signal. All conditions employing maskers with coherent envelopes produced very similar thresholds, and all showed improved sensitivity over the case of detecting a signal added to a single masker centered on the signal frequency. Results are interpreted as evidence that a change in envelope beats does not form the basis of detection in CMR.
与跨频率的掩蔽包络相干性相关的检测优势通常是根据跨听觉通道的信息比较来描述的。最近有人提出,对一个更宽的初始滤波器的输出进行分析,类似于为TMTF所建议的那样,可以解释这些数据[B.G.伯格,《美国声学学会杂志》100,1013 - 1023(1996)]。这种方法表明,包络拍频的变化可以作为添加纯音信号的线索。这里给出了检测添加到具有相干包络的多个掩蔽器中的音调的数据。在一种情况下,包络拍频的变化是一个准确的潜在线索,而在其他情况下,这种变化太不可靠,无法作为信号存在的指标。所有使用具有相干包络的掩蔽器的条件都产生了非常相似的阈值,并且与检测添加到以信号频率为中心的单个掩蔽器中的信号的情况相比,所有条件都显示出灵敏度有所提高。结果被解释为表明包络拍频的变化不是CMR检测的基础的证据。