Chang C F, Kiser L J, Bailey J E, Martins M, Gibson W C, Schaberg K A, Mirvis D M, Applegate W B
Fogelman College of Business and Economics, University of Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
JAMA. 1998 Mar 18;279(11):864-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.11.864.
In July 1996, Tennessee initiated a managed mental health and substance abuse program called TennCare Partners. This publicly funded "carve-out" experiment started chaotically and soon deteriorated into a crisis. Many patients did not receive care or lost continuity of care, and the traditional "safety net" mental health system nearly disintegrated. This qualitative case study sought to ascertain the impact of the TennCare Partners program. It points out that the program's difficulties stemmed directly from a flawed design that spread funds previously earmarked for severely mentally ill patients across the entire Medicaid population. States contemplating similar reforms should strive to protect vulnerable patients by risk-adjusting capitation payments and by focusing resources on care for severely mentally ill persons. States should also minimize program complexity and ensure the accountability of managed care networks for their patients' behavioral health care needs.
1996年7月,田纳西州启动了一项名为“田纳西关怀伙伴”的管理式心理健康与药物滥用项目。这个由公共资金支持的“分离”实验启动时一片混乱,很快便恶化成一场危机。许多患者得不到治疗或失去了连续治疗,传统的“安全网”心理健康系统几乎瓦解。这项定性案例研究旨在确定“田纳西关怀伙伴”项目的影响。研究指出,该项目的困难直接源于一个有缺陷的设计,即将先前专门用于重症精神病患者的资金分散到了整个医疗补助人群中。考虑进行类似改革的州应努力通过风险调整人头付费以及将资源集中用于重症精神病患者的护理来保护弱势患者。各州还应尽量降低项目的复杂性,并确保管理式医疗网络对其患者的行为健康护理需求负责。