Hall J, Macdonald I A, Maddison P J, O'Hare J P
Physiotherapy Department, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Feb;77(3):278-84. doi: 10.1007/s004210050333.
This study compared the cardiorespiratory responses of eight healthy women (mean age 30.25 years) to submaximal exercise on land (LTm) and water treadmills (WTm) in chest-deep water (Aquaciser). In addition, the effects of two different water temperatures were examined (28 and 36 degrees C). Each exercise test consisted of three consecutive 5-min bouts at 3.5, 4.5 and 5.5 km x h(-1). Oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR), measured using open-circuit spirometry and telemetry, respectively, increased linearly with increasing speed both in water and on land. At 3.5 km x h(-1) VO2 was similar across procedures [chi = 0.6 (0.05) l x min(-1)]. At 4.5 and 5.5 km x h(-1) VO2 was significantly higher in water than on land, but there was no temperature effect (WTm: 0.9 and 1.4, respectively; LTm: 0.8 and 0.9 l x min(-1), respectively). HR was significantly higher in WTm at 36 degrees C compared to WTm at 28 degrees C at all speeds, and compared to LTm at 4.5 and 5.5 km x h(-1) (P < or = 0.003). The HR-VO2 relationship showed that at a VO2 of 0.9 l x min(-1) x HR was higher in water at 36 degrees C (115 beats x min[-1]) than either on land (100 beats min[-1]) or in water at 28 degrees C (99 beats x min[-1]). The Borg scale of perceived exertion showed that walking in water at 4.5 and 5.5 km x h(-1) was significantly harder than on land (WTm: 11.4 and 14, respectively; LTm: 9.9 and 11, respectively; P < or = 0.001). These cardiorespiratory changes occurred despite a slower cadence in water (the mean difference at all speeds was 27 steps/min). Thus, walking in chest-deep water yields higher energy costs than walking at similar speeds on land. This data has implications for therapists working in hydrotherapy pools.
本研究比较了八名健康女性(平均年龄30.25岁)在陆地上进行次最大强度运动(陆地运动)和在胸部深度的水中使用水上跑步机(水上运动)时的心肺反应。此外,还研究了两种不同水温(28摄氏度和36摄氏度)的影响。每次运动测试包括以3.5、4.5和5.5千米/小时的速度连续进行三轮5分钟的运动。分别使用开路肺活量测定法和遥测技术测量的耗氧量(VO2)和心率(HR),在水中和陆地上均随速度增加呈线性增加。在3.5千米/小时时,不同测试程序的VO2相似[χ = 0.6(0.05)升/分钟]。在4.5和5.5千米/小时时,水中的VO2显著高于陆地,但没有温度效应(水上跑步机:分别为0.9和1.4;陆地运动:分别为0.8和0.9升/分钟)。在所有速度下,36摄氏度时水上跑步机的HR显著高于28摄氏度时的水上跑步机,并且在4.5和5.5千米/小时时高于陆地运动(P≤0.003)。HR-VO2关系表明,在VO2为0.9升/分钟时,36摄氏度水中的HR(115次/分钟)高于陆地(每分钟100次)或28摄氏度水中的HR(99次/分钟)。伯格主观用力程度量表显示以4.5和5.5千米/小时的速度在水中行走比在陆地上明显更费力(水上跑步机:分别为11.4和14;陆地运动:分别为9.9和11;P≤0.001)。尽管在水中的步频较慢(所有速度下的平均差异为每分钟27步),这些心肺变化仍然发生。因此,在胸部深度的水中行走比在陆地上以相似速度行走产生更高的能量消耗。这些数据对在水疗池工作的治疗师具有启示意义。