Salter R, Smith S
Postgraduate Department, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 1998 Jan;74(867):33-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.867.33.
Recently successful MRCP (UK) candidates were asked to rate the value of clinical experience, reading, practice with past or simulated examination papers and commercially organised courses as preparation for parts 1 and 2 of the examination. With respect to part 1, practice with past and simulated papers was unanimously felt to be of crucial importance with examination-focused reading helpful. Clinical experience was deemed irrelevant and commercially organised courses a matter of individual choice. For part 2, clinical experience was felt to be of fundamental importance but needed to be practised in an 'examination atmosphere'. Both general reading and practice with past and simulated papers were judged helpful and commercially organised courses were perceived to be of more value than for part 1. Trainees should be advised to seek advice on examination preparation from both 'authoritative sources' and their recently successful colleagues.
近期通过英国皇家内科医学院临床专业考试(MRCP)的考生被要求对临床经验、阅读、做过去或模拟试卷以及参加商业组织的课程对于该考试第1部分和第2部分备考的价值进行评分。关于第1部分,大家一致认为做过去的和模拟试卷对于备考至关重要,以考试为重点的阅读也很有帮助。临床经验被认为无关紧要,而参加商业组织的课程则因人而异。对于第2部分,临床经验被认为至关重要,但需要在“考试氛围”中进行实践。一般阅读以及做过去的和模拟试卷都被认为有帮助,而且商业组织的课程被认为比第1部分更有价值。应建议学员向“权威人士”和近期通过考试的同事寻求关于考试准备的建议。