Gaines E, Chila A G
West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1998 Mar;98(3):164-8.
Questions about the scientific merits of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and the search for consistent, effective teaching methods for OMT persist in the discourse of the osteopathic medical curriculum. Although grounded on scientific principles, the philosophy of osteopathic medicine in the words of Andrew Taylor Still, William G. Sutherland, and other prominent osteopathic medical scholars advances concepts in metaphoric language that may seem obscure and dated to many of today's students. Evidence in the literature of osteopathic medicine supports the congruence of phenomenology with the philosophy and methods used to teach OMT. Phenomenology offers an alternative paradigm to address questions of scientific merit and could provide a consistent language to a rigorous, scientific approach to communication for OMT pedagogy. The authors propose a solution for the tactical adaptation of a communication strategy based on an interpretation of osteopathic medical methodology and phenomenology.
关于整骨手法治疗(OMT)的科学价值以及寻找一致、有效的OMT教学方法的问题,一直存在于整骨医学课程的讨论中。尽管整骨医学的理念基于科学原理,但用安德鲁·泰勒·斯蒂尔、威廉·G·萨瑟兰和其他著名整骨医学学者的话来说,整骨医学的理念是以隐喻性语言推进概念的,这对当今许多学生来说可能显得晦涩且过时。整骨医学文献中的证据支持现象学与用于教授OMT的理念和方法的一致性。现象学提供了一个替代范式来解决科学价值问题,并可为OMT教学法提供一种严谨、科学的交流一致语言。作者基于对整骨医学方法和现象学的解读,提出了一种战术性调整沟通策略的解决方案。