Kim P S, Arvan P
Division of Endocrinology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267, USA.
Endocr Rev. 1998 Apr;19(2):173-202. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.2.0327.
From the studies described in this review, it is clear that structural information dictates not only the functional properties of exportable proteins, but also their ability to be transported in the intracellular secretory pathway. In ERSDs, the precise nature of the defect determines both the severity of the phenotype and the mode of inheritance. To our knowledge, all genetically inherited ERSDs are attributable to mutations in the coding sequence of exportable proteins; thus far, with the exception of abetalipoproteinemia (see Section IV.D), no mutations in ER chaperones (other than those that scientists have genetically engineered) have been reported as the cause of spontaneous disease. The elevations of ER chaperones in ERSDs may differ between mutations, between tissues, between individual patients, and between different physiological states (i.e., such as before and after hormone replacement therapy) in the same patient. Thus, measurement of ER chaperone levels plays an important diagnostic role, but probably should not be used as the sole basis to classify these illnesses. Moreover, because mutant secretory proteins have been reported to occur in virtually every organ system, ERSDs are more readily classified at the cell biological level, by the responses of the cells that actually synthesize the secretory protein, rather than the hormone deficiency associated with the illness at the end-organ level. With these ideas in mind, we present a schematic view in Fig. 4. According to this schema, all ERSDs begin with ER retention of the affected proteins or their subunits. Mutants may then be divided into two groups: type A, where the biological activity is preserved although the protein is transport-deficient; and type B, where the mutant has no potential for functional activity. Both categories include both recessive and dominant mutations. The primary clinical difference between these two classes is that type A ERSDs may be amenable to therapies designed to down-regulate the quality control of ER export so that potentially functional molecules can escape the ER and reach their intended intracellular destination. In both types of ERSDs, in most cases, the retained mutant protein is efficiently degraded in the ER (subtypes A-I and B-I). In these cases, the predominant, global phenotypes involve the symptoms and signs of hormone deficiency. However, careful biochemical and cell biological studies reveal various abnormalities in glandular function, typically including the elevation of the levels of one or more ER chaperones. As described in Section I.C, such elevations are a consequence of chronic adaptation to the presence of unfolded mutant secretory protein (the synthesis of which is stimulated all the more by endocrine feedback loops). As described in Section III, the elevated chaperones appear to be integrally related to the ER retention as well as perhaps the ERAD process that removes the misfolded proteins. In these cases, the ER compartment may expand, but the secretory cells are likely to survive. In the more unusual subtype II (subtypes B-II and perhaps A-II), the mutant protein exhibits an intrinsic tendency to resist ERAD, creating a potentially dangerous accumulation of indigestible material (Fig. 4). This may be due to the unusual production of novel, protease-resistant protein complexes, or it may be due to the formation of protein assemblies that prevent the reverse translocation of mutant proteins to the cytosol for proteasomal proteolysis. Resistance of untransported mutant protein to ER-associated degradation will predispose to a dominant ERSD (460). In such a case, although the mutant allele could could form oligomeric hybrids with the wild-type allele, complete nonmixing of the normally exported wild-type allele and toxic accumulation of the mutant allele is another distinct scenario that can also produce a dominant mode of inheritance. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
从本综述中描述的研究可以清楚地看出,结构信息不仅决定了可输出蛋白的功能特性,还决定了它们在细胞内分泌途径中的运输能力。在内质网储存障碍(ERSDs)中,缺陷的确切性质决定了表型的严重程度和遗传模式。据我们所知,所有遗传性ERSDs都归因于可输出蛋白编码序列中的突变;到目前为止,除了无β脂蛋白血症(见第四节D部分),尚未有内质网伴侣蛋白(除了科学家通过基因工程改造的那些)的突变被报道为自发性疾病的病因。内质网伴侣蛋白在ERSDs中的升高可能因突变、组织、个体患者以及同一患者不同生理状态(如激素替代治疗前后)的不同而有所差异。因此,内质网伴侣蛋白水平的测量具有重要的诊断作用,但可能不应作为这些疾病分类的唯一依据。此外,由于据报道突变分泌蛋白几乎出现在每个器官系统中,ERSDs更适合在细胞生物学水平上进行分类,依据实际合成分泌蛋白的细胞的反应,而不是依据终末器官水平上与疾病相关的激素缺乏情况。基于这些想法,我们在图4中展示了一个示意图。根据这个模式,所有ERSDs都始于受影响蛋白或其亚基在内质网的滞留。突变体随后可分为两组:A类,尽管蛋白存在运输缺陷但其生物活性得以保留;B类,突变体没有功能活性的潜力。这两类都包括隐性和显性突变。这两类之间的主要临床差异在于,A类ERSDs可能适合采用旨在下调内质网输出质量控制的疗法,以便潜在的功能分子能够逃离内质网并到达其预期的细胞内目的地。在这两种类型的ERSDs中,在大多数情况下,滞留的突变蛋白在内质网中被有效降解(A-I和B-I亚型)。在这些情况下,主要的整体表型涉及激素缺乏的症状和体征。然而,仔细的生化和细胞生物学研究揭示了腺体功能的各种异常,通常包括一种或多种内质网伴侣蛋白水平的升高。如第一节C部分所述,这种升高是长期适应未折叠突变分泌蛋白存在的结果(其合成因内分泌反馈回路而进一步受到刺激)。如第三节所述,升高的伴侣蛋白似乎与内质网滞留以及可能与去除错误折叠蛋白的内质网相关降解(ERAD)过程密切相关。在这些情况下,内质网腔可能会扩大,但分泌细胞可能存活。在更不常见的II型亚型(B-II亚型,可能还有A-II亚型)中,突变蛋白表现出抵抗ERAD的内在倾向,导致不可消化物质的潜在危险积累(图4)。这可能是由于新型蛋白酶抗性蛋白复合物的异常产生,或者可能是由于形成了阻止突变蛋白逆向转运到细胞质进行蛋白酶体蛋白水解的蛋白聚集体。未运输的突变蛋白对内质网相关降解的抗性将易引发显性ERSD(460)。在这种情况下,尽管突变等位基因可能与野生型等位基因形成寡聚体杂种,但正常输出的野生型等位基因与突变等位基因的完全不混合以及突变等位基因的毒性积累是另一种不同的情况,也可产生显性遗传模式。(摘要截断)