Kamal G D, Divishek D, Kumar G C, Porter B R, Tatman D J, Adams J R
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Mar;30(3):145-52. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00215-0.
We report a comparative analysis of intravascular catheter-related infection before and after routine use of antibiotic-bonded catheters in an intensive care unit. Cefazolin-bonded catheters were placed in patients requiring catheterization for at least 3 days, or with remote infection, standard catheters at other times. One thousand forty-five catheters (259 patients) over 6 months were compared with 801 (236 antibiotic-bonded, 565 standard) catheters (239 patients) the next 6 months. After use of antibiotic-bonded catheters, we found: 1.7% catheters infected versus 3.7% (p = 0.01); catheter-associated bacteremia 0.1% versus 1.3% (p < 0.005); catheter-related infection rate 4.39 versus 10.73 per 1000 patient days (p < 0.005), and 5.06 versus 11.47 per 1000 catheter days (p < 0.01); and cumulative risk of infection decreased (p < 0.005). Antibiotic-bonded catheters were used with more remote infections (52% versus 27%, p < 0.001), had longer indwelling time (4.4 versus 3.1 days, p = 0.0001), and more were inserted over a guide wire (66% vs. 28%, p < 0.001). In conclusion routine use of antibiotic-bonded catheters was associated with a significant reduction in infectious complications.
我们报告了在重症监护病房常规使用抗生素涂层导管前后血管内导管相关感染的比较分析。将头孢唑啉涂层导管用于需要进行至少3天导管插入术的患者,或有远处感染的患者,其他时间使用标准导管。将6个月内的1045根导管(259例患者)与接下来6个月的801根导管(236根抗生素涂层导管,565根标准导管)(239例患者)进行比较。使用抗生素涂层导管后,我们发现:导管感染率为1.7%,而之前为3.7%(p = 0.01);导管相关菌血症为0.1%,而之前为1.3%(p < 0.005);每1000患者日的导管相关感染率为4.39,而之前为10.73(p < 0.005),每1000导管日为5.06,而之前为11.47(p < 0.01);感染的累积风险降低(p < 0.005)。抗生素涂层导管用于远处感染较多的患者(52%对27%,p < 0.001),留置时间更长(4.4天对3.1天,p = 0.0001),且更多是通过导丝插入(66%对28%,p < 0.001)。总之,常规使用抗生素涂层导管可显著降低感染并发症。