Boon H
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 May;46(9):1213-25. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)10050-8.
This paper describes naturopathic practitioners with two different world views--holistic and scientific, and explores the relationship of practitioners' socialization experiences and practice patterns with these two world views. Data were gathered by a variety of methods including: (1) a 14-page questionnaire mailed to all 296 naturopathic practitioners licensed in Canada; (2) a participant observation study at the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CCNM); and (3) open-ended interviews with 16 students attending CCNM and 41 naturopathic practitioners which were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Individuals with both holistic and scientific world views entered naturopathic training and none of the practitioners who were interviewed reported a change in world view while at naturopathic college. However, practitioners reported a new-found appreciation of the "other" world view on completion of their training, indicating the occurrence of a socialization effect. Many decisions involved in setting up a practice and seeing patients were affected by the practitioners' world views. For example, there were distinct differences in the way the practitioners with different world views who were interviewed chose treatment modalities. Practitioners with scientific world views reported choosing treatments based on the available "scientific evidence", while practitioners with holistic world views included a careful exploration of the patient's spirituality and their own intuition in their treatment decisions. In addition, practitioners with holistic world views reported significantly longer patient visits than practitioners with scientific world views. The data presented here suggest that one's world view influences one's perceptions of socialization experiences and social situations, and modulates the effects of both on practice patterns.
本文描述了持有两种不同世界观——整体观和科学观的自然疗法从业者,并探讨了从业者的社会化经历和实践模式与这两种世界观之间的关系。数据通过多种方法收集,包括:(1)向加拿大所有296名获得执照的自然疗法从业者邮寄一份14页的问卷;(2)在加拿大自然疗法医学院(CCNM)进行的参与观察研究;(3)对16名就读于CCNM的学生和41名自然疗法从业者进行的开放式访谈,访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。兼具整体观和科学观的人进入了自然疗法培训,接受访谈的从业者中没有人报告在自然疗法学院期间世界观发生了变化。然而,从业者报告称,在完成培训后,他们对“另一种”世界观有了新的认识,这表明出现了一种社会化效应。建立诊所和诊治患者过程中涉及的许多决策都受到从业者世界观的影响。例如,接受访谈的持有不同世界观的从业者在选择治疗方式上存在明显差异。持有科学世界观的从业者报告称,他们根据现有的“科学证据”选择治疗方法,而持有整体世界观的从业者在治疗决策中会仔细探究患者的精神层面和自身的直觉。此外,持有整体世界观的从业者报告的患者就诊时间明显长于持有科学世界观的从业者。此处呈现的数据表明,一个人的世界观会影响其对社会化经历和社会情境的认知,并调节两者对实践模式的影响。