Wahl G, Schibel J M
Institut für Tropenmedizin, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
Parasitology. 1998 Apr;116 ( Pt 4):337-48. doi: 10.1017/s0031182097002321.
In order to assess the prevalence of the cattle filaria Onchocerca ochengi in onchocerciasis vectors (Simulium damnosum s.l.) in North Cameroon, we searched for a means to morphologically identify its developing larvae, which closely resemble those of O. volvulus. To this end microfilariae of the 2 Onchocerca species were isolated from slaughter cattle in Ngaoundéré and injected into neonate Simulium species. Whereas the early developmental stages (sausage stage, L2 and pre-infective larva) were indistinguishable, the infective larvae (L3) of O. ochengi were longer (median: 740 microns), more slender (diameter = 19.3 microns = 2.6% of body length) and had a relatively shorter tail (4.9% of body length) than those of O. volvulus (680 microns, 20.5 microns, 3.0% and 5.8% respectively). The tail of O. ochengi L3 was thick and rounded, whereas it was slightly tapering in O. volvulus L3. O. ochengi L3 produced by feeding flies on infected cattle in a different area in North Cameroon (Sora Mboum) showed the same features as intrathoracically produced O. ochengi L3 from Ngaoundéré, but were even longer (785 microns). On the basis of the differences in length, relative diameter, length of the tail and shape of the tail, a simple key for the separation of O. volvulus and O. ochengi L3 was elaborated, and 248 L3 found in wild S. damnosum s.l. were separated into 'O. ochengi' (160 L3) and 'O. volvulus' (88 L3) following this key. Sequential dot blot hybridization of each of the 248 larvae with a DNA probe which reacts with O. ochengi and O. volvulus but not with other Onchocerca species (pOo5/1) and with an O. volvulus-specific DNA probe (pOv12) revealed that the morphological identification had been correct in 86-91% of the cases. Only a small proportion (6-9%) of the dot blots did not react with either probe. Since this proportion was equal in experiments using experimentally produced L3 and in experiments using wild L3, the nonhybridization was certainly due to a loss of L3 during washing of the filters and not due to the presence of other unknown L3 species resembling O. volvulus and O. ochengi. Our study shows that in Cameroon it is possible to identify O. volvulus and O. ochengi infective larvae during routine fly dissections by morphology alone.
为评估喀麦隆北部盘尾丝虫病媒介(恶蚋复合种)中牛丝状虫——奥氏盘尾丝虫的流行情况,我们寻找了一种从形态学上鉴定其发育幼虫的方法,这些幼虫与旋盘尾丝虫的幼虫极为相似。为此,从恩冈代雷的屠宰牛中分离出这两种盘尾丝虫的微丝蚴,并注入新生的蚋种体内。虽然早期发育阶段(香肠期、L2期和感染前期幼虫)难以区分,但奥氏盘尾丝虫的感染性幼虫(L3期)比旋盘尾丝虫的更长(中位数:740微米)、更细长(直径 = 19.3微米 = 体长的2.6%),且尾巴相对较短(体长的4.9%),而旋盘尾丝虫的L3期分别为680微米、20.5微米、3.0%和5.8%。奥氏盘尾丝虫L3期的尾巴粗且圆,而旋盘尾丝虫L3期的尾巴则略微渐细。在喀麦隆北部不同地区(索拉姆布姆)让苍蝇吸食感染牛后产生的奥氏盘尾丝虫L3期与从恩冈代雷经胸腔接种产生的奥氏盘尾丝虫L3期具有相同特征,但甚至更长(785微米)。基于长度、相对直径、尾巴长度和尾巴形状的差异,制定了一个区分旋盘尾丝虫和奥氏盘尾丝虫L3期的简易检索表,按照此检索表,在野外捕获的248条恶蚋复合种L3期幼虫被分为“奥氏盘尾丝虫”(160条L3期幼虫)和“旋盘尾丝虫”(88条L3期幼虫)。用一种与奥氏盘尾丝虫和旋盘尾丝虫反应但不与其他盘尾丝虫种反应的DNA探针(pOo5/1)以及一种旋盘尾丝虫特异性DNA探针(pOv12)对这248条幼虫逐一进行斑点杂交,结果显示形态学鉴定在86 - 91%的情况下是正确的。只有一小部分(6 - 9%)斑点杂交不与任何一种探针发生反应。由于在使用实验产生的L3期幼虫的实验和使用野外L3期幼虫的实验中,这个比例是相同的,所以这种非杂交现象肯定是由于在洗涤滤膜过程中L3期幼虫丢失所致,而不是由于存在其他类似旋盘尾丝虫和奥氏盘尾丝虫的未知L3期虫种。我们的研究表明,在喀麦隆,仅通过形态学就能在常规的苍蝇解剖过程中鉴定出旋盘尾丝虫和奥氏盘尾丝虫的感染性幼虫。