Roberts W L, Calcote C B, Cook C B, Gordon D L, Moore M L, Moore S, Scheer W D, Snazelle B A
Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA.
Clin Chim Acta. 1998 May 8;273(1):21-33. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00021-7.
The results of four urinary albumin methods used to identify patients with early diabetic renal disease were compared using random urine samples from healthy and diabetic patients. These methods were the Beckman Array and Behring BNAI immunonephelometric methods, the Dade aca particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay method, and the INCSTAR SPQ immunoturbidimetric method. The albumin/creatinine ratio reference interval was found to be 2-20 mg albumin/g creatinine (mg/g) for the Array and 3.5-27.5 mg/g for the aca method. All four methods were compared using urines from a group of diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The BNAI, SPQ and Array methods compared well with one another while the aca demonstrated a positive bias of almost 60% at the 30 mg/g and 300 mg/g levels with certain lots of reagent and calibrator. Calibrator cross-over experiments demonstrated that some of the positive bias of the aca method could be accounted for by calibrator differences.
利用健康人和糖尿病患者的随机尿液样本,比较了用于识别早期糖尿病肾病患者的四种尿白蛋白检测方法。这些方法分别是贝克曼阵列法和贝林BNAI免疫比浊法、达德aca颗粒增强浊度抑制免疫分析法以及INCSTAR SPQ免疫比浊法。发现阵列法的白蛋白/肌酐比值参考区间为2 - 20毫克白蛋白/克肌酐(mg/g),aca法为3.5 - 27.5 mg/g。使用一组糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的尿液对所有四种方法进行了比较。BNAI、SPQ和阵列法相互之间比较吻合,而aca法在某些试剂批次和校准品条件下,在30 mg/g和300 mg/g水平时显示出近60%的正偏差。校准品交叉实验表明,aca法的一些正偏差可归因于校准品差异。