Iwao T, Oho K, Sakai T, Sato M, Nakano R, Yamayaki M, Toyonaga A, Tanikawa K
Department of Medicine II, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.
J Hepatol. 1998 May;28(5):847-55. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80236-5.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The portal pressure response to propranolol administration is heterogeneous in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive hemodynamic parameters of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and femoral artery (FA) in the prediction of portal pressure response to propranolol.
Twenty-six patients with cirrhosis were studied. Portal pressure was assessed by measurements of hepatic venous pressure gradient. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were also recorded. Cardiac index, and flow velocity of SMA and FA, and pulsatility index of SMA and FA were then measured by means of Doppler ultrasonography. After intravenous propranolol administration (0.10 mg/kg), the above measurements were repeated.
Propranolol significantly reduced cardiac index, heart rate, SMA flow velocity, and FA flow velocity and increased SMA pulsatility index and FA pulsatility index. Although propranolol significantly decreased hepatic venous pressure gradient, a reduction of > or =20% was seen in only 10 patients (good responders); the remaining 16 patients exhibited <20% reduction (poor responders). No significant differences in clinical and baseline hemodynamic data were found in the two groups. There were no also significant differences in changes in heart rate and cardiac index. However, reductions in SMA and FA flow velocity were significantly greater in good responders than in poor responders. Although there was no the increase in FA pulsatility index, the increase in SMA pulsatility index was significantly greater in good responders than in poor responders. When appropriate cut-off points were determined for these variables, overall predictive values of SMA flow velocity (-20%) and SMA pulsatility index (+15%) were 91% and 83%, whereas the overall predictive value of FA flow velocity (-25%) was only 69%.
These results suggest that SMA flow velocity and SMA pulsatility index, but not FA flow velocity and FA pulsatility index, are useful noninvasive parameters in the prediction of portal pressure response to propranolol administration.
背景/目的:肝硬化患者对普萘洛尔给药的门静脉压力反应存在异质性。本研究的目的是检验肠系膜上动脉(SMA)和股动脉(FA)的非侵入性血流动力学参数在预测普萘洛尔门静脉压力反应方面的诊断准确性。
对26例肝硬化患者进行研究。通过测量肝静脉压力梯度评估门静脉压力。同时记录平均动脉压和心率。然后通过多普勒超声测量心脏指数、SMA和FA的流速以及SMA和FA的搏动指数。静脉注射普萘洛尔(0.10 mg/kg)后,重复上述测量。
普萘洛尔显著降低心脏指数、心率、SMA流速和FA流速,并增加SMA搏动指数和FA搏动指数。尽管普萘洛尔显著降低肝静脉压力梯度,但仅10例患者(反应良好者)降低幅度≥20%;其余16例患者降低幅度<20%(反应不良者)。两组在临床和基线血流动力学数据方面无显著差异。心率和心脏指数的变化也无显著差异。然而,反应良好者SMA和FA流速降低幅度显著大于反应不良者。尽管FA搏动指数无增加,但反应良好者SMA搏动指数增加幅度显著大于反应不良者。当为这些变量确定合适的截断点时,SMA流速(-20%)和SMA搏动指数(+15%)的总体预测值分别为91%和83%,而FA流速(-25%)的总体预测值仅为69%。
这些结果表明,SMA流速和SMA搏动指数,而非FA流速和FA搏动指数,是预测普萘洛尔给药后门静脉压力反应的有用非侵入性参数。