Wan J S, Sharp S J, Poirier G M, Wagaman P C, Chambers J, Pyati J, Hom Y L, Galindo J E, Huvar A, Peterson P A, Jackson M R, Erlander M G
R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Dec;14(13):1685-91. doi: 10.1038/nbt1296-1685.
Differential gene expression occurs in the process of development, maintenance, injury, and death of unicellular as well as complex organisms. Differentially expressed genes are usually identified by comparing steady-state mRNA concentrations. Electronic subtraction (ES), subtractive hybridization (SH), and differential display (DD) are methods commonly used for this purpose. A rigorous examination has been lacking and therefore quantitative aspects of these methods remain speculative. We compare these methods by identifying a total of 58 unique differentially expressed mRNAs within the same experimental system (HeLa cells treated with interferon-gamma). ES yields digital, reusable data that quantitated steady-state mRNA concentrations but only identified abundant mRNAs (seven were identified), which represent a small fraction of the total number of differentially expressed mRNAs. SH and DD identified abundant and rare mRNAs (33 and 23 unique mRNAs respectively) with redundancy. The redundancy is mRNA abundance-dependent for SH and primer-dependent for DD. We conclude that DD is the method of choice because it identifies mRNAs independent of prevalence, uses small amounts of RNA, identifies increases and decreases of mRNA steady-state levels simultaneously, and has rapid output.
差异基因表达发生在单细胞生物以及复杂生物体的发育、维持、损伤和死亡过程中。差异表达基因通常通过比较稳态mRNA浓度来鉴定。电子消减(ES)、消减杂交(SH)和差异显示(DD)是常用于此目的的方法。目前缺乏严格的检验,因此这些方法的定量方面仍属推测。我们通过在同一实验系统(用γ干扰素处理的HeLa细胞)中鉴定总共58个独特的差异表达mRNA来比较这些方法。ES产生数字化、可重复使用的数据,可定量稳态mRNA浓度,但仅鉴定出丰富的mRNA(鉴定出7个),这仅占差异表达mRNA总数的一小部分。SH和DD鉴定出了丰富和稀少的mRNA(分别为33个和23个独特的mRNA),存在冗余。对于SH,冗余依赖于mRNA丰度;对于DD,冗余依赖于引物。我们得出结论,DD是首选方法,因为它能独立于丰度鉴定mRNA,使用少量RNA,能同时鉴定mRNA稳态水平的增加和减少,且输出结果快速。