Nonanesthetic volatile drugs obey the Meyer-Overton correlation in two molecular protein site models.

BACKGROUND

Nonanesthetic volatile compounds fail to inhibit movement in response to noxious stimulation at concentrations predicted to induce anesthesia from their oil-water partitioning. Thus they represent tools to determine whether molecular models behave like the targets that mediate in vivo anesthetic actions. The effects of volatile anesthetics and nonanesthetics were examined in two experimental models in which anesthetics interact directly with proteins: the pore of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and human serum albumin.

METHODS

Wild-type mouse muscle nicotinic receptors and receptors containing pore mutations (alphaS252I + betaT263I) were studied electrophysiologically in membrane patches from Xenopus oocytes. Patch currents evoked by brief pulses of acetylcholine were measured in the presence of enflurane and two nonanesthetics, 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane and 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane. Nonanesthetic interactions with human serum album were assessed by quenching of intrinsic protein fluorescence.

RESULTS

Both anesthetic and nonanesthetic volatile compounds inhibited wild-type and alphaS252I + betaT263I mutant nicotinic channels but displayed different selectivity for open versus resting receptor states. Median inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) in wild-type nicotinic receptors were 870+/-20 microM for enflurane, 37+/-3 microM for 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocylcobutane, and 11.3+/-5.6 microM for 2,3-dichlorooctafluorobutane. For all three drugs, ratios of wild-type IC50s to mutant IC50mut ranged from 7-10, and ratios of wild-type IC50s to predicted anesthetic median effective concentrations (EC50s) ranged from 1.8-2.3. 1,2-Dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane quenched human serum albumin with an apparent dissociation constant (Kd) of 160+/-11 microM. The ratios of dissociation constants to predicted EC50s for the nonanesthetics were within a factor of two of the dissociation constant:EC50 ratios calculated for halothane and chloroform from previous published results.

CONCLUSIONS

In two models in which anesthetics bind to protein sites, both anesthetic and nonanesthetic volatile drugs cause similar steady state effects with potencies that are predicted by hydrophobicity. These protein sites do not sterically discriminate between anesthetic and nonanesthetic drugs. However, differential state-selective actions on ion channel targets may underlie the distinct in vivo effects of anesthetics and nonanesthetics.