Suppr超能文献

[曲马多对映体用于术后疼痛治疗是否比消旋体更合适?一项随机、安慰剂和吗啡对照的双盲研究]

[Are tramadol enantiomers for postoperative pain therapy better suited than the racemate? A randomized, placebo- and morphine-controlled double blind study].

作者信息

Wiebalck A, Zenz M, Tryba M, Kindler D, Donner B, Czekalla U

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Anaesthesiologie, Intensiv- und Schmerztherapie, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Bochum.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1998 May;47(5):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s001010050574.

Abstract

The goal of this prospective, randomised and double-blind pilot-study was to investigate the analgesic potency and the side-effects of tramadol enantiomers in clinical practice. One hundred patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery with a postoperative pain intensity of more than 50 on a visual analogue scale 0-100 mm (Table 1) were recruited for the study. They were treated in a randomised, double-blind way with a maximal dose of 150 mg i.v.(+)-,(-)-tramadol, racemate, or 15 mg i.v. morphine or saline in the placebo group (5 groups, 20 patients each). The primary criterium of efficacy was the number of responders defined as patients with a pain reduction of at least 20 on VAS after 40 min. In case of pain, responders were allowed to continue with the double-blind drug up to six hours. The non-responders were treated with morphine as the rescue analgesic. The secondary criterium was the incidence and severity of side-effects. Six patients terminated the study prematurely. One patient was excluded because of an allergic reaction to morphine, one patient could not be treated sufficiently with morphine, four were excluded because of protocol violations. There were 8 responders in the (+)-tramadol-,6 in the (-)-tramadol- and 6 in the racemate group, 16* (P < 0.05) in the morphine group, and 5 in the placebo group. Pain intensity after 40 min was reduced by 20 (p < 0.05), 17 (p < 0.05), 17 (p < 0.05), 36 (p < 0.01 vs placebo, p < 0.05 vs (+)-,(-)-tramadol, and racemate group) and 5 mm on the VAS in the (+)-, (-)-, (+/-)-tramadol-, morphine- and placebo-group, respectively. Thirty eight adverse events like nausea, vomiting, PCO2-increase, and urinary retention occurred in 20 patients, most frequently in the (+)-tramadol- and morphine group. Sedation was significantly less profound in the (-)-tramadol group 1-4 h postoperatively. There were no side-effect in the tramadol racemate group. The enantiomers were equal to the racemate in analgesic potency, but inferior by far to morphine. They showed more adverse events and, hence, can not be preferred to the racemate in postoperative pain therapy.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机双盲试验研究的目的是在临床实践中调查曲马多对映体的镇痛效力和副作用。招募了100例骨科手术后恢复、视觉模拟评分0 - 100 mm术后疼痛强度超过50的患者进行研究(表1)。他们被随机双盲给予最大剂量150 mg静脉注射(+)-、(-)-曲马多、消旋体,或安慰剂组给予15 mg静脉注射吗啡或生理盐水(5组,每组20例患者)。疗效的主要标准是反应者的数量,定义为40分钟后视觉模拟评分疼痛减轻至少20分的患者。如果疼痛,反应者可继续使用双盲药物长达6小时。无反应者用吗啡作为解救镇痛药治疗。次要标准是副作用的发生率和严重程度。6例患者提前终止研究。1例患者因对吗啡过敏被排除,1例患者用吗啡治疗效果不佳,4例因违反方案被排除。(+)-曲马多组有8例反应者,(-)-曲马多组有6例,消旋体组有6例,吗啡组有16例*(P < 0.05),安慰剂组有5例。40分钟后视觉模拟评分的疼痛强度在(+)-、(-)-、(±)-曲马多组、吗啡组和安慰剂组分别降低了20(p < 0.05)、17(p < 0.05)、17(p < 0.05)、36(与安慰剂相比p < 0.01,与(+)-、(-)-曲马多和消旋体组相比p < 0.05)和5 mm。20例患者发生了38例不良事件,如恶心、呕吐、PCO₂升高和尿潴留,最常见于(+)-曲马多组和吗啡组。术后1 - 4小时,(-)-曲马多组的镇静作用明显较轻。曲马多消旋体组无副作用。对映体在镇痛效力上与消旋体相当,但远不如吗啡。它们显示出更多的不良事件,因此,在术后疼痛治疗中不能优于消旋体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验