Schiano T D, McCray W H, Liu J B, Baranowski R J, Bellary S V, Black M, Miller L S
Gastroenterology/Liver Section, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals, Illinois 60637, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):249-52. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199806000-00005.
Our objective in this study was to use high resolution endoluminal sonography to compare the size of esophageal varices within 5 cm of and at the esophageal high pressure zone. We carried out the study in 36 patients with endoscopically proven esophageal varices. A 20-MHz 6.2F ultrasound catheter was passed through a 34F endoscope and used to image esophageal varices as it was slowly withdrawn through the high pressure zone (the level at which the diaphragm was imaged) and into the body of the esophagus approximately 5 cm above the high pressure zone. All images were captured on videotape and reviewed by one of the investigators. The mean, total, and percent cross-sectional surface areas occupied by varices were calculated and then compared within 5 cm and at the esophageal high pressure zone. Six of 36 (17%) patients had no varices imaged at the high pressure zone but did have varices imaged in the distal esophagus. The mean cross-sectional surface area per varix at the high pressure zone (0.036+/-0.006 cm2) was significantly less (p < or = 0.0001) than the mean cross-sectional area per varix 5 cm above the high pressure zone (0.142+/-0.018 cm2). The average total cross-sectional surface area occupied by varices at the high pressure zone (0.137+/-0.034 cm2) was significantly less (p < 0.0001) than the average cross-sectional surface area occupied by varices 5 cm above the high pressure zone (0.672+/-0.080 cm2). The mean percent esophageal wall cross-sectional surface area occupied by varices at the high pressure zone (16%) was significantly less (p < or = 0.0001) than 5 cm above the high pressure zone (49%). We conclude that the mean, total, and percent cross-sectional surface areas of esophageal varices at the high pressure zone are significantly less than those 5 cm above the high pressure zone.
本研究的目的是使用高分辨率腔内超声检查来比较食管高压区及其上方5厘米范围内食管静脉曲张的大小。我们对36例经内镜证实有食管静脉曲张的患者进行了研究。将一根20兆赫6.2F的超声导管通过一根34F的内窥镜,当它缓慢地从高压区(即能看到膈肌的水平)抽出并进入食管高压区上方约5厘米处的食管体部时,用其对食管静脉曲张进行成像。所有图像都录制在录像带上,并由一名研究人员进行查看。计算静脉曲张所占的平均、总面积和横截面面积百分比,然后在高压区内及其上方5厘米处进行比较。36例患者中有6例(17%)在高压区未检测到静脉曲张,但在食管远端检测到了静脉曲张。高压区每个静脉曲张的平均横截面面积(0.036±0.006平方厘米)显著小于高压区上方5厘米处每个静脉曲张的平均横截面面积(0.142±0.018平方厘米)(p≤0.0001)。高压区静脉曲张所占的平均总横截面面积(0.137±0.034平方厘米)显著小于高压区上方5厘米处静脉曲张所占的平均横截面面积(0.672±0.080平方厘米)(p<0.0001)。高压区静脉曲张所占食管壁平均横截面面积百分比(16%)显著小于高压区上方5厘米处(49%)(p≤0.0001)。我们得出结论,高压区食管静脉曲张的平均、总面积和横截面面积百分比显著小于高压区上方5厘米处。