Kably B, Drew T
Centre Hospitalier, Hôpital des Spécialités, Service du Neurophysiologie, BP 6220 Rabat Institute, Morocco.
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;80(1):389-405. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.389.
This paper summarizes and compares the projection patterns and the receptive fields of cortical neurons in areas 4 and 6 that project to the pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF). A total of 326 neurons were recorded in area 4 and 129 in area 6 in four awake, unrestrained cats that were chronically implanted with arrays of electrodes in the PMRF and the pyramidal tract (PT). In area 4, 47% of the neurons projected to the caudal PT but not to the PMRF (PTNs); 19% were activated only from the PMRF [corticoreticular neurons (CRNs)], whereas 27% were activated from both the PT and the PMRF (PTN/CRNs). More PTN/CRNs conducted at velocities >20 m/s (82%) than did CRNs (23%). In area 6, only 19% of the neurons were identified as PTNs, 12% were PTN/CRNs and 31% were CRNs; a further 38% could not be activated from either structure. Collateral branches within the PMRF conducted at maximum velocities of 20 m/s (average = 6.5 m/s). No significant differences in the conduction velocities of the collateral branches were found either between fast and slow PTNs or between area 4 and area 6 neurons. A large proportion of neurons in area 4 (85/173, 49%) were activated by passive manipulation of the more distal, contralateral forelimb, with approximately equal numbers being classed as PTNs, PTN/CRNs and CRNs. Most neurons in area 6 for which a receptive field could be found were excited by lightly touching or tapping the face and neck; a receptive field could not be determined for 39% of the area 6 neurons compared with only 5% of those in area 4. Finally, there was evidence that neurons in quite widespread areas of the pericruciate cortex, including both areas 4 and 6 projected onto similar, restricted regions of the PMRF. The fact that the cortical projection from area 4 to the PMRF includes a high percentage of fast PTNs with a receptive field on the distal forelimb is consistent with the view that this projection may serve to integrate movement and the dynamic postural adjustments that accompany them. The fact that the cortical projection from area 6 to the PMRF is primarily from slow PTNs with receptive fields on the face, neck and back is consistent with a role for this cortical area in adjusting the general posture of the animal on which movements are superimposed.
本文总结并比较了大脑4区和6区中投射至脑桥延髓网状结构(PMRF)的皮质神经元的投射模式和感受野。在4只长期植入了PMRF和锥体束(PT)电极阵列的清醒、自由活动的猫中,共记录了4区的326个神经元和6区的129个神经元。在4区,47%的神经元投射至尾侧PT但不投射至PMRF(PT神经元);19%仅由PMRF激活[皮质网状神经元(CRN)],而27%由PT和PMRF两者激活(PT/CRN)。与CRN(23%)相比,更多的PT/CRN以>20 m/s的速度传导(82%)。在6区,仅19%的神经元被鉴定为PT神经元,12%为PT/CRN,31%为CRN;另有38%不能从任何一个结构激活。PMRF内的侧支以20 m/s的最大速度传导(平均 = 6.5 m/s)。在快速和慢速PT神经元之间,以及4区和6区神经元之间,侧支的传导速度均未发现显著差异。4区的很大一部分神经元(85/173,49%)通过被动操作对侧更远端的前肢而被激活,归类为PT神经元、PT/CRN和CRN的数量大致相等。6区中大多数能找到感受野的神经元通过轻轻触摸或轻拍面部和颈部而被兴奋;6区39%的神经元无法确定感受野,而4区仅5%的神经元无法确定感受野。最后,有证据表明,包括4区和6区在内的中央沟周围皮质相当广泛区域的神经元投射至PMRF的相似、受限区域。4区至PMRF的皮质投射包含高比例具有前肢远端感受野的快速PT神经元,这一事实与该投射可能用于整合运动及其伴随的动态姿势调整的观点一致。6区至PMRF的皮质投射主要来自具有面部、颈部和背部感受野的慢速PT神经元,这一事实与该皮质区域在调整叠加运动的动物总体姿势方面的作用一致。