Owens D K, Edwards D M, Shachter R D
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, CA 94304, USA.
AIDS. 1998 Jun 18;12(9):1057-66.
To evaluate the population effects of potential preventive and therapeutic vaccines in early- and late-stage epidemics in a population of homosexual men.
An epidemic model was used that simulated the course of the epidemic for a population of homosexual men in San Francisco, California. Vaccine programs were evaluated by the number of cases of HIV averted, the effect on the prevalence of HIV, and by the gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for the total population.
In the model, a preventive vaccine prevented 3877 cases of HIV infection during a 20-year period, reduced the projected prevalence of HIV infection from 12 to 7% in a late-stage epidemic, and gained 15,908 QALY. A therapeutic vaccine that did not affect the infectivity of vaccine recipients increased the number of cases of HIV infection by 210, resulted in a slight increase in the prevalence of HIV infection from 12 to 15% in a late-stage epidemic, and gained 8854 QALY. If therapeutic vaccines reduced infectivity, their use could produce net gains of QALY in the population that were similar to gains from the use of preventive vaccines. In an early-stage epidemic, the advantage of a preventive vaccine program relative to a therapeutic vaccine program was markedly enhanced.
Both preventive and therapeutic vaccine programs provided substantial benefit, but their relative merit depended on which outcome measures were assessed. Evaluation of HIV vaccine programs based solely on cases averted or on prevalence of HIV in the population underestimates the benefit associated with therapeutic vaccine programs. The effect of a therapeutic HIV vaccine on the epidemic outcomes depended markedly on whether the therapeutic vaccine reduced the infectivity of the vaccine recipient. The relative merits of preventive and therapeutic vaccines depend on the stage of the epidemic. Field vaccine trials should evaluate correlates of infectivity, such as HIV viral load. HIV vaccine implementation strategies should be tailored to the dynamics of the epidemic in specific populations.
评估潜在的预防性和治疗性疫苗在男同性恋人群早期和晚期疫情中的群体效应。
使用一种流行病模型来模拟加利福尼亚州旧金山男同性恋人群的疫情发展过程。通过避免的HIV病例数、对HIV流行率的影响以及总人口质量调整生命年(QALY)的增加来评估疫苗计划。
在模型中,一种预防性疫苗在20年期间预防了3877例HIV感染,在晚期疫情中将预计的HIV感染流行率从12%降至7%,并获得了15908个QALY。一种不影响疫苗接种者传染性的治疗性疫苗使HIV感染病例数增加了210例,在晚期疫情中导致HIV感染流行率从12%略有上升至15%,并获得了8854个QALY。如果治疗性疫苗降低了传染性,其在人群中的使用可产生与预防性疫苗使用相似的QALY净收益。在早期疫情中,预防性疫苗计划相对于治疗性疫苗计划的优势显著增强。
预防性和治疗性疫苗计划都带来了显著益处,但其相对优点取决于所评估的结果指标。仅基于避免的病例数或人群中HIV流行率对HIV疫苗计划进行评估会低估与治疗性疫苗计划相关的益处。治疗性HIV疫苗对疫情结果的影响明显取决于该治疗性疫苗是否降低了疫苗接种者的传染性。预防性和治疗性疫苗的相对优点取决于疫情阶段。现场疫苗试验应评估传染性的相关指标,如HIV病毒载量。HIV疫苗实施策略应根据特定人群中疫情的动态情况进行调整。