Brass C A
Schering Oncology/Biotech, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Clin Ther. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):388-97. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80050-7.
Results of numerous studies have demonstrated similar efficacy profiles for the interferons (IFNs) currently approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although it has been suggested that some IFNs are more efficacious in certain patient populations, the current data support an equivalent efficacy and safety profile for these agents. Among patients requiring retreatment, no single study has made a direct comparison of IFN alfa-2b (IFN-alpha 2b) and consensus IFN (CIFN) in patients who have relapsed or have not responded to previous IFN therapy. However, at least 11 studies using IFN-alpha 2b and 1 using CIFN have demonstrated efficacy in the relapsing and nonresponding patient populations. A review of these studies suggests that overall efficacy and tolerability are similar regardless of IFN-alpha subtype. Overall, up to 59% and 83% of relapsed patients retreated with IFN have shown sustained response rates, as measured by negative HCV RNA titer and normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, respectively. Up to 14% and 25% of patients who failed to respond to previous IFN therapy have shown sustained HCV RNA response and normalization of ALT, respectively, after retreatment.
众多研究结果表明,目前获批用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的干扰素(IFN)具有相似的疗效。尽管有人认为某些干扰素在特定患者群体中疗效更佳,但目前的数据支持这些药物具有同等的疗效和安全性。在需要再次治疗的患者中,尚无一项研究对复发或对先前干扰素治疗无反应的患者直接比较干扰素α-2b(IFN-α 2b)和共识干扰素(CIFN)。然而,至少11项使用IFN-α 2b的研究和1项使用CIFN的研究已证明在复发和无反应患者群体中具有疗效。对这些研究的综述表明,无论IFN-α亚型如何,总体疗效和耐受性相似。总体而言,分别以HCV RNA滴度阴性和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平正常化衡量,接受IFN再次治疗的复发患者中高达59%和83%显示出持续应答率。在先前干扰素治疗无反应的患者中,再次治疗后分别有高达14%和25%的患者显示出HCV RNA持续应答和ALT正常化。