Suppr超能文献

对比度和时间频率对亮度和等亮度刺激的方向辨别能力的影响。

Effects of contrast and temporal frequency on orientation discrimination for luminance and isoluminant stimuli.

作者信息

Reisbeck T E, Gegenfurtner K R

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1998 Apr;38(8):1105-17. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00240-x.

Abstract

We compared the mechanisms responsible for orientation discrimination of stimuli defined by luminance and red/green isoluminant contrast. A four-alternative forced-choice (4-AFC) paradigm was used to determine thresholds for discriminating 1 cpd sinewave gratings differing in orientation, contrast, or both. When measuring orientation thresholds as a function of stimulus contrast, we found a decrease in thresholds with increasing stimulus contrast. For three temporal frequencies (0, 1, and 8 Hz) the functions relating orientation thresholds to stimulus contrast had similar shapes for luminance and isoluminant gratings, indicating similar processing mechanisms. Thresholds for stationary or slowly moving gratings were consistently lower for isoluminant than for luminance gratings, when contrast was expressed on an absolute RMS-cone-contrast scale. When contrast was defined as multiples of detection thresholds, discrimination was slightly better for luminance gratings. Thresholds for fast moving gratings were similar, irrespective of the definition of contrast. In contrast to previous work, we found a marked "oblique-effect" for both luminance and isoluminant gratings, when measuring discrimination thresholds as a function of standard orientation. Finally, we measured discrimination thresholds for gratings that varied in contrast and orientation simultaneously. The shapes of the resulting two-dimensional threshold contours were similar for luminance and isoluminant gratings, indicating again that these stimuli undergo similar neuronal processing. Performance of the observers could be described by probability summation of the orientation and contrast cues, resulting in an elliptical shape of the two-dimensional threshold contours. In conclusion, our results show similar performance for luminance and isoluminant gratings in several orientation discrimination tasks. The similarity in shape of the different threshold functions presents strong evidence that similar mechanisms underlie orientation discrimination of luminance and isoluminant stimuli.

摘要

我们比较了由亮度和红/绿等亮度对比度定义的刺激的方向辨别机制。采用四选一强制选择(4-AFC)范式来确定辨别方向、对比度或两者都不同的1 cpd正弦波光栅的阈值。在测量作为刺激对比度函数的方向阈值时,我们发现随着刺激对比度的增加,阈值降低。对于三个时间频率(0、1和8 Hz),将方向阈值与刺激对比度相关的函数对于亮度光栅和等亮度光栅具有相似的形状,表明处理机制相似。当对比度以绝对RMS-视锥细胞对比度标度表示时,等亮度静止或缓慢移动光栅的阈值始终低于亮度光栅。当对比度定义为检测阈值的倍数时,亮度光栅的辨别能力略好。快速移动光栅的阈值相似,与对比度的定义无关。与先前的研究不同,在测量作为标准方向函数的辨别阈值时,我们发现亮度光栅和等亮度光栅都有明显的“倾斜效应”。最后,我们测量了对比度和方向同时变化的光栅的辨别阈值。亮度光栅和等亮度光栅的二维阈值轮廓形状相似,再次表明这些刺激经历了相似的神经元处理。观察者的表现可以通过方向和对比度线索的概率总和来描述,从而产生二维阈值轮廓的椭圆形。总之,我们的结果表明,在几个方向辨别任务中,亮度光栅和等亮度光栅的表现相似。不同阈值函数形状的相似性提供了有力证据,表明亮度和等亮度刺激的方向辨别有相似的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验