Phase II and dose-escalation with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor study of 9-aminocamptothecin in relapsed and refractory lymphomas.

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and maximum dose-intensity of a new topoisomerase I (topo I)-targeting agent, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had measurable disease and were considered incurable. 9-AC was infused over 72 hours at an initial dose rate of 40 microg/m2/h every 3 weeks with subsequent intrapatient escalations or reductions in 10-microg/m2/h increments based on toxicity. To assess the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on dose-intensity, the first 16 patients received no G-CSF and the subsequent 29 patients received G-CSF on all cycles.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received a total of 142 cycles of 9-AC. The patients' median age was 55 years, 73% had stage IV disease, and histologies included indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in 33% and 58% of patients, respectively, and Hodgkin's lymphoma in 9%. Patients had received a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens, and 67% of patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Of 40 assessable patients, 10 (25%) achieved a partial response (PR). Chemotherapy-sensitive patients had a 32% response rate compared with 8% in chemotherapy-resistant patients. With a median follow-up duration of 35 months, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival times were 1.5 and 12.5 months, respectively, and the median duration of response was 5 months (range, 1 to 10). G-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea, but did not permit a significant increase in dose-intensity.

CONCLUSION

9-AC had a reasonable response rate of 25% in heavily pretreated patients. The low response rate in patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease suggests that there is cross-resistance between 9-AC and standard chemotherapy. However, there was no association between 9-AC response and the number of prior regimens. Due to dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, G-CSF support did not increase dose-intensity, although individual patients benefited from the use of G-CSF.